论文代写案例-A1
Table 1
Project draft Exemplary (A1
Outstanding-A2
Excellent)
Accomplished
(B1/B2 Very good,
B3 Good)
Developing (C1/
C2/C3
Satisfactory)
Unsatisfactory (D) LO
Topic
identification and
research
objectives
Identifies a highly
relevant topic or
case study that is
engaging and
thought provoking.
Effectively and
convincingly
outlines a clear
aim/objective of the
study.
Identifies a relevant
research topic and
outlines a clear aim/
objective for the
project with some
degree of interest
for the reader.
Identifies a research
topic but may be
too broad in scope.
The aim/objective is
somewhat unclear
and needs to be
developed further.
Fails to identify a
relevant research
topic or aim/
objective is not
clearly defined.
Feasibility Careful reflection
and thought has
been given to the
feasibility of the
project. Student
demonstrate
effective time
management for
the case to be
studied.
The student has
thought and
reflected about the
feasibility of the
study in the
available time.
The student is
vague about the
feasibility of the
study.
Fails to reflect on
the feasibility of the
study.
1
Table 1
Overall Excellent review,
Impressive ability to
make effective
judgements.
Sound ability to
make effective
judgements by
critical analysis and
evaluation.
Some ability to
make judgements
by analysis and
evaluation.
Weaknesses in
ability to make
judgements by
analysis and
evaluation.
Identifying both
positive and
negative aspects
Excellent ability to
give constructive
feedback on what
worked and what
could be improved.
Very appropriate
and sensitive
language use.
Very good
constructive
feedback about
what worked well
and what could be
improved.
Appropriate
language used.
Good review with
limited feedback
about what worked
well and what could
be improved.
Brief review, no
useful feedback
about what worked
well and what could
be improved.
Inappropriate
language.
Suggestions (if
applicable)
Provides excellent
ideas
Provides useful
ideas
1
Table 1
Forum activity Exemplary (A1
Outstanding-A2
Excellent)
Accomplished
(B1/B2 Very good,
B3 Good)
Developing (C1/
C2/C3
Satisfactory)
Unsatisfactory (D) LOs
Response to
feedback
Has read and given
consideration to all
the points raised by
the peer. Very
effectively responds
to and discusses all
issues and other
feedback raised by
peers. Gives clear
reasons and a plan
of action for (not)
making changes to
the project.
Has read all the
feedback. Gives
consideration to
most of the points
raised by the peer.
Responds and
discusses most of
the issues and
feedback raised.
Outlines if, how and
why changes are
being made to the
project.
Response to the
feedback could be
more detailed.
Unclear and vague
plans for
implementing the
feedback.
No response to
feedback and no
plans presented for
implementing the
feedback.
Link with research
and lecture
concepts
Excellent
discussion of
existing research (at
least 2 articles).
Excellent
understanding of
relevant concepts
covered in the
lecture. Effectively
explains how the
articles and
concepts are linked
to their own project.
Research sources
are highly relevant,
accurate and
reliable and add to
the strength of the
proposal. Sources
are effectively
referenced and
cited throughout
the proposal.
Good discussion of
existing research (at
least 2 articles).
Demonstrates
understanding of
central lecture
concepts. Links the
articles and
concepts to their
own research idea.
Selects research
sources that are
mostly relevant,
accurate and
reliable. Sources
are referenced and
cited appropriately
throughout the
paper for the most
part.
Some, albeit vague
uncritical or
incomplete,
discussion of the
chosen articles and
concepts. Contains
some factual
mistakes or
oversimplifications.
Link to own idea
could be clearer.
Some sources may
not be relevant,
accurate and
reliable and/or
appropriately
referenced and
cited.
Lacks sufficient
grasp of the
meaning and/or
significance of
some concepts. If
included, (some of)
the chosen
concepts and
articles are
generally not
relevant, accurate
or reliable. Contains
numerous factual
mistakes,
omissions, or
oversimplifications.
Sources, if included
are not properly
referenced and
cited.
Research design
and methodology
Well written and
detailed description
of the research
methodology. The
chosen methods
are highly
appropriate for this
type of project and
are directly linked
to the purpose/
objectives of the
project. Plans for
data collection and
analysis is highly
appropriate for the
research and needs
little or no
refinement. Clear
research situation,
space and time
period.
Moderately well
written and mostly
complete
description of the
research
methodology. The
chosen methods
appear appropriate
and related to the
purpose of the
project. Plans for
data collection and
analysis are
appropriate for the
research but need
some refinement,
maybe a reduction
of the studied time
frame and amount
of data.
Partial description
of methods which
appear to be
related to
objectives of the
project. Plans for
data collection and
analysis appear
appropriate for the
research but need
significant
refinement, maybe
a reduction fo the
studied time period
and amount of data
to be collected and
analysed.
Incomplete and
little description of
methods. Methods
appear
inappropriate or
unrelated to
objectives of the
project. Plans for
data collection and
analysis are
incomplete and
inappropriate.
1
Table 1
Project website Exemplary (A1
Outstanding-A2
Excellent)
Accomplished
(B1/B2 Very good,
B3 Good)
Developing (C1/
C2/C3
Satisfactory)
Unsatisfactory (D) LOs
Introduction and
research
objectives
The aim of the
project is
consistently the
focal point
throughout the
website.
The aim is the focal
point of the website
for the most part.
Focal point is not
consistently
maintained
throughout the
website.
Website lacks focus
throughout.
Implementation of
research
methodology
(design and
implementation,
including
appropriateness,
methods in
alignment with
objectives)
Impressive
implement of the
research plan.
Analysis is highly
appropriate for the
research and needs
little or no
refinement
Good
implementation of
the research plan.
Data analysis is
appropriate for the
research but needs
some refinement.
Data analysis
appears
appropriate for the
research but needs
significant
refinement.
Incomplete and
little description of
methods. Methods
appear
inappropriate or
unrelated to
objectives of the
project. Data
analysis is
incomplete and
inappropriate.
Findings,
discussion and
conclusion
Demonstrates a
sophisticated
understanding and
careful, critical
analysis of the
research topic/case
study in alignment
with the objective
fo the project.
Excellent
selection of
examples and
impressive ability to
make effective
judgements by
critical analysis and
evaluation of
examples based on
application of
knowledge from the
lecture and own
reading.
Compares/
contrasts
perspectives,
considers counter
arguments or
opposing positions,
and draw original
and thoughtful
conclusions with
future
implications.
Demonstrates an
understanding and
some critical
analysis of the
research topic in
alignment with the
objective, applies
knowledge dean
from the lecture
and own reading.
Adequately
compares/contrasts
perspectives,
counter-arguments,
or opposing
positions but
broader
connections and/or
implications are not
as thoroughly
explored.
Demonstrates
general
understanding with
limited critical
analysis of the
research topic.
Summarises
perspectives,
counter-arguments,
or opposing
positions. Contains
some over-
simplification and/
or sweeping
generalising and
unsupported
statements about
the case/topic
which tell of a
limited application
of knowledge
drawn from the
lecture and reading.
Demonstrates a
lack of
understanding and
inadequate analysis
of the research
topic. Analysis is
superficial based
on opinions and
preferences rather
than critical
analysis. Contains a
lot of over-
simplification and/
or sweeping
generalising and
unsupported
statements about
the case/topic.
Link with research
and lecture
concepts
Excellent linking of
examples with
existing research.
Excellent
understanding or
and linking to
concepts covered
in the lecture.
Provides
compelling and
accurate evidence
to support in-depth
the central position
or situation of the
case/topic.
Research sources
are highly relevant,
accurate and
reliable and add to
the strength of the
paper. Sources are
effectively
referenced and
cited throughout
the paper.
Provides essential,
accurate evidence
to support the
central position and
situation of the
project, with
research sources
that are mostly
relevant, accurate
and reliable.
Demonstrates
understanding of
central lecture
concepts. Sources
are referenced and
cited appropriately
throughout the
paper for the most
part.
Provides some
evidence to support
the central position
or situation of the
case/topic with only
a few research
sources and
references to key
concepts. Some
sources may not be
relevant, accurate
and reliable and/or
appropriately
referenced and
cited.
Lacks sufficient
research sources to
support the central
position or situation
of the case/topic. If
included, they are
generally not
relevant, accurate
or reliable. Contains
numerous factual
mistakes,
omissions, or
oversimplifications.
Sources, if included
are not properly
referenced and
cited.
1
Structure,
organisation and
creativity
Website is
effectively
organised and
highly creative.
Ideas are arranged
logically, flow
smoothly, with a
strong progression
of thought from
paragraph to
paragraph
connecting to the
central objective.
Includes all
required
components
(Introduction,
methodology,
examples and
analysis,
conclusion,
reference list)
Website is
adequately
organised and
creative. Ideas are
arranged
reasonably with a
progression fo
thought from
paragraph to
paragraph
connecting to the
central objective.
Includes required
components for the
most part.
Paper is somewhat
organised, although
occasionally ideas
from paragraph to
paragraph may not
flow well and/or
connect to the
central objectives
and/or be clear as a
whole. May be
missing a required
component and/or
components may
be less than
complete.
Paper lacks logical
organisation and
impedes readers’
comprehension of
ideas. Central
objective gets lost
or is rarely evident
from paragraph to
paragraph and/or
the website is
missing multiple
required
components.
Writing style and
presentation
Website is well
written and clear
using standard
English characterised
by elements of a
strong writing style,
free from grammar,
punctuation, spelling,
usage or formatting
errors.
Paper shows above
average writing
style and clarity in
writing. Minor errors
in grammar,
punctuation,
vocabulary, usage
or formatting.
Paper shows an
average and/or
casual writing style.
Some errors in
spelling, grammar,
punctuation, usage,
and/or formatting.
Paper shows a
below average/poor
writing style.
Frequent errors in
spelling, grammar,
punctuation,
spelling, usage
and/or formatting.
Exemplary (A1
Outstanding-A2
Excellent)
Accomplished
(B1/B2 Very good,
B3 Good)
Developing (C1/
C2/C3
Satisfactory)
Unsatisfactory (D) LOsProject website
2

欢迎咨询51作业君
51作业君 51作业君

Email:51zuoyejun

@gmail.com

添加客服微信: IT_51zuoyejun