程序辅导案例 > Program >

代写辅导接单-ECON 7460 Health Economics 2025 Assignment 3: Report

欢迎使用51辅导，51作业君孵化低价透明的学长辅导平台，服务保持优质，平均费用压低50%以上！ 51fudao.top

ECON 7460 Health Economics 2025

Assignment 3: Report

Task Description: Write a 2500 word report USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TITLES.

1. Explain how the Grossman model departs from the standard microeconomic approach and how it may be used for theoretical predictions for health care demand.

2. Discuss market failure in the health care context and provide solutions to get closer to equilibrium.

3. Discuss inequity in the context of health care and discuss how it relates to inequality in the distribution of health care.

How to approach your report:

· Introduction: Include title (given above), page numbers, what is the research question. First paragraph must state the aim of the report in the first line.

· Theoretical framework: Provide 3 concepts and discuss. For example, in the Grossman topic, one might refer to the consumption and production of health, the efficiency of production in health and

· Main literature: Readings that are associated with this report are provided in the reading lists in each lecture, and are also referenced in some of the key papers). Discuss at least 2 key papers that are relevant to the topic, their aims and methodologies.

· Discussion: Include main results from the 2 key papers and discuss.

· Critique: How does the evidence build on previous literature, e.g. the paper adds by providing new data, methods, analyses, ideas etc. What are the strengths of the paper (usually provided)? What are the limitations of the paper, usually these are provided too, and sometimes called weaknesses. Use evidence for critique, e.g. the literature does not use enough data to provide a conclusive result – this will be stated in the paper itself, or a paper that follows, at a later date, will reflect back and state this – reference the evidence. Opinions are allowed but need to be backed up by high quality evidence from literature. At least one strength and one limitation is to be provided and discussed.

Keep critique to a relevant word count, e.g. 750 words.

· Presentation: Provide an excellent layout/presentation, including diagrams (with sources) and references, where appropriate.

Keep the report to approx. 2500 words, ensure key concepts are included.

Submission

· Submit online using the Turnitin link provided on the course blackboard site by the due date and time indicated in the course ECP.

· Submission from October 1^st to October 28th, 2025, 2pm) upload report in Blackboard

Marking:

55% in total provided, with marking as follows out of 100 marks:

• Introduction 20 marks

• Theoretical Framework 20 marks

• Main literature 10 marks

• Discussion 10 marks

• Critique 30 marks

• Presentation 10 marks

Total marks 100

Please see Rubric on page 2 below.

Tips:

· Writing tips provided on Blackboard

· Example assignments provided on Blackboard

· Writing resources provided in Library

	High Distinction 85-100%	Distinction 75-84%	Credit 65-74%	Pass 50-64%	Fail <50

Introduction (20 marks)	The content presented gives a thorough and insightful overview of the chosen topic, aims clearly stated.	The content presented gives a comprehensive overview of the chosen topic.	The content presented gives a clear overview of the chosen topic.	The content presented gives a correct overview, with some errors, of the chosen topic.	The content in your introduction has several errors.
Theoretical framework (20 marks)	Key concepts and ideas are presented in a clear, fluent, coherent manner. There are obvious and clear connections between your sections, enhancing the structure.	Key concepts and ideas are presented in a clear manner with a logical structure.	Key concepts and ideas are mainly clear. The connections between discussion points are not always obvious.	Key concepts and ideas are not always clear.	Key concepts and ideas are not clear. Fewer than three main concepts are discussed in your report.
Main literature (10 marks)	Key literature is mentioned, with aims and methodologies clearly set out.	Key literature is presented in a clear manner with logical structure.	The aims and methodologies of key literature are mainly clear. The connections between discussion points not always clear.	The aims and methodologies are not always clear.	Fewer than two key literature sources are provided. Aims and methodologies are not clear.
Discussion (10 marks)	Main results from the two key literature sources are excellently set out and discussed.	Main results from the key literature is presented in a clear manner, with logical structure.	Results are provided but not always clear.	Results are missing in some instances and are not always clear.	Results are not discussed.
Critique (30 marks)	Strengths and weakness of the key literature are excellently presented, with evidence provided.	Strengths and weakness of the key literature are presented clearly and coherently, with evidence provided.	Strengths and weakness of the key literature are presented with evidence provided, but some points are not always clear.	Not all relevant strengths and weaknesses are provided. At least one of each to be provided.	Strengths and weaknesses are not sufficiently provided and not discussed.
Presentation (10 marks)	Your script is clearly well-organised and well-structured. Your writing is fluent, informative, and engaging. Correct grammar and spelling are used throughout, with no errors.	Your script follows the structural requirements of the task. Your writing is mostly fluent and informative. Correct grammar and spelling are used throughout, with the occasional minor error.	Your script organises content reasonably well, but it could be better structured in places. Your writing flows well in most places. Mostly appropriate grammar and spelling is used with several minor errors.	Your script does not follow the structural requirements of the task and has several errors. Your writing tends to be disjointed. Grammar and spelling are consistently incorrect with several minor and/or major errors.	Your script does not follow the structural requirements of the task and has several major errors. Your writing is disjointed. Grammar and spelling are consistently incorrect with many major errors.