DPBS 1190 - Marking Rubrics for Assessment 2: Individual Project Report
Weight
%
Criteria Fail (0% - 49%) Pass
(50% -
64%)
Credit
(65%- 74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
10 Problem Identification
Does not identify a
business problem or a
task objective.
Identify a
business problem
but misses many
details.
Identify a business
problem but misses a
few details.
Identify a business
problem and task
objectives covering
important aspects of
business context.
Identify a business
problem and task
objectives with clarity
and depth, supported
by real-life business
context.
45 Data Analysis
Assessment
requirements were
not followed and no
relevant
visualization
technique and
descriptive statistics
was used.
Use visualization
techniques and
descriptive
statistics,
mentioned in the
Assessment
Guide for solving
the problem.
Identify variables
for each technique
to be deployed.
Attempt to present
a logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
variable selection,
but the logic is not
coherent or clear.
The data
subsetting is
done
appropriately in
line with the
business goal.
Use visualization
techniques and
descriptive statistics
with a good
explanation and
clarity in line with
Assessment Guide
for solving the
problem in line with
Assessment Guide.
Identify and explain
variables for each
technique to be
deployed.
Attempt to present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
variable selection.
Analyze data but
explanations of
analysis results are
insufficient.
The data
subsetting is
done
appropriately in
line with the
business goal.
Use visualization
techniques and
descriptive statistics
providing higher
level of clarity and
explanation in line
with Assessment
Guide for solving
the problem.
Identify, explain,
and justify variables
for each technique
to be deployed.
Explicitly present a
logic between
business issues,
analytical
techniques, and
variable selection.
Analyze data
adequately with
sufficient
explanations of the
issues identified, but
the solutions to
solving the issues
Use all visualization
techniques mentioned
in the Assessment
Guide and descriptive
statistics for solving
the problem with
excellent clarity and
explanation.
Identify, explain, and
justify variables for
each technique to be
deployed. The
justifications are
sound and convincing.
Explicitly present a
coherent and clear
logic between
business issues,
analytical techniques,
and variable
selection. The logic is
coherent and clear.
Analyze data
adequately with
sufficient
No appropriate
data subsetting
done.
No specific
variable was
identified.
No logic between
business issues,
analytical techniques,
and variable selection.
The results are mostly
incorrectly interpreted.
No discussion on outlier
implications.
No R codes are included.
Weight
%
Criteria Fail (0% -
49%)
Pass
(50% -
64%)
Credit
(65%- 74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
Attempt to
analyze data but
conduct
inadequate data
analysis in some
aspects.
The results are
somewhat
correctly
examined and
interpreted.
Discussion on
outlier analysis
and their
implications is
somewhat
explained.
R codes are
included but
extensive errors
are identified.
The results are
mostly correctly
examined and
interpreted.
Discussion on
outlier analysis
and their
implications is
clearly explained
but appropriate
variables are not
taken into account.
R codes are
included but some
errors are identified.
identified are
reasonably
sufficient.
The data
subsetting is done
appropriately in
line with the
business goal
The results of each
model are mostly
correctly
interpreted and
examined
supported by
academic
references. Results
interpretation is
relevant and
meaningful in the
case context.
Discussion on
outlier analysis
and their
implications is
clearly explained
with appropriate
variables
considered.
R codes attached
are mostly correct.
explanations of the
issues identified,
and with adequate
solutions to the
issues identified
using statistics and
visualization.
The data subsetting
is done appropriately
in line with the
business goal.
The results of each
visualization and
findings are correctly
interpreted and
critically examined
supported by
academic
references. Results
interpretation is
relevant and
meaningful in the
case context.
Discussion on outlier
analysis and their
implications
explained in a very
comprehensive
manner.
R codes attached
are thoroughly
correct.
30 Insights Inadequate or no
insights of the
analysis/evidence are
provided.
Insights are
somewhat
inconsistently tied
to some of the
issues discussed
and inconsistently
linked back to
variables analyzed.
Insights are
consistently tied to
each issue
discussed and
linked back to
variables analyzed.
Insights are logically
and consistently tied
to each issue
discussed and linked
back to variables
analyzed.
Insights are
logically and
consistently tied to
each issue
discussed, linked
back to variables
analyzed, and
developed with
critical thinking.
Weight
%
Criteria Fail
(0% - 49%)
Pass
(50% - 64%)
Credit
(65%-74%)
Distinction
(75%-84%)
High Distinction
(85% - 100%)
10 Communication Your writing is not
professional in tone
and there are major
spelling and
grammatical errors
throughout.
Your written
expression does not
indicate a logic/flow
between each
section of the essay.
Some attempt has
been made to use a
professional tone and
presentation in your
writing, but there are
some spelling and
grammatical errors.
You have endeavored
to provide logic/flow
between each section
of the essay.
Your writing is mostly
professional in tone
and presentation, but
there are occasional
spelling and/or
grammatical errors.
Your written
expression provides
an adequate
indication of the
logic/flow between
each section of the
essay.
Your writing is
professional in tone
and presentation
with a few very minor
spellings and/or
grammatical errors.
Your written
expression provides
a strong indication of
the logic/flow
between each
section of the essay.
Your writing is
professional in tone
and presented in an
outstanding manner
with no spelling or
grammatical errors.
Your written
expression provides a
strong and coherent
indication of the
logic/flow between
each section of the
essay that has
enabled key
arguments to
fully develop.
05
Organization and
structure of the
report
Poor or unclear
structure.
Your sources have
not been referenced
and/or there are
excessive errors in
referencing in the
report.
The word limit has
not been adhered to
in line with the
Assessment Guide.
Attempt to a good
structure but lack
coherent flow
between sections.
Some sources are
referenced throughout
the report, but there
are errors in your
referencing of
sources.
The word limit has
been adhered.
Good structure with
organized headings.
Most sources are
referenced
throughout the
report, with only
minor errors in
referencing.
The word limit has
been adhered.
Good structure with
organized headings
and coherent follow
between sections.
All sources are
referenced
throughout the
report with only
minor errors in
referencing.
The word limit
has been
adhered.
Good structure with
organized headings
and coherent follow
between sections.
All sources are
referenced
throughout the report
and the sources are
used very well, with
no significant errors
in referencing.
The word limit has
been adhered.
51作业君版权所有
