Page 1 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF—Option 2: Industry Project
Subject Code and Title ATW306 Advanced Tech: Work-Integrated Learning
Assessment Project Action Plan Review—Final Presentation
Individual/Group Group
Length A 2,500-word (+/–10%) group submission and a 13–15-minute group
presentation
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion
of the task below include:
a) Demonstrate interpersonal skills by prioritising
competing demands to achieve personal goals and
well-developed judgement and responsibility in
professional practice.
b) Apply planning, problem solving and decision-making
skills within the context of professional practice.
c) Utilise software engineering methodologies to evaluate
solutions for efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability.
d) Identify ethical implications of professional practice.
e) Reflect on opportunities within professional practice to
engage in independent lifelong learning.
f) Communicate effectively in ways appropriate to the
discipline, client, audience and purpose.
Submission 12-Week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT, Wednesday of week 12
Weighting 40%
Total Marks 100 marks
Assessment Task
Prepare and present the final version of your project as a team, including a demonstration
of the software that you have developed and a final project action plan review that provides
an overview of the project development process.
Context
You have reached the final stage of your project development process. Presenting final
products to colleagues offers workplace-based teams the opportunity to provide overviews
of the projects that they have been working on and address any questions from the
audience with a minimal turnaround time.
Page 2 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Project delivery is one of the major steps in a successful project. This assessment will assess
your programming skills, ability to follow a software plan, ability to analyse and manage
risks and ability to follow a quality management plan. The presentation will assess your
ability to effectively communicate your ideas to other stakeholders. The project action plan
review will measure your ability to reflect on the work you have been doing and your ability
to analyse and solve the problems that you faced.
Instructions
Congratulations! Your team is incredibly close to wrapping up the project that you have
been working so hard on! This final assessment is based on the project that you have been
working towards in the previous two assessments. You will need to formulate your
presentation and final project action plan with your learning facilitator’s ongoing feedback
in mind. Ensure that you are following the project plan that was submitted as part of
Assessment 2 and that any changes made are mentioned in this final presentation and
review.
Assessment 3 requires you to prepare a project action plan review and a 13–15 minute-
presentation in which you have the opportunity to demonstrate the software that you have
produced to your learning facilitator. Ensure that the software is of a high quality and
includes all the features that were proposed in the earlier assessments. For any features
that you were unable to provide, ensure that you mention the challenges experienced that
prevented their implementation.
Please follow the guidelines below for your project action plan review:
• Project Overview
o Discuss the purpose and goals of the project.
o Discuss the scope of the developed project.
• Final Product/Project Usage Scenarios
o Discuss how the final product is helpful to the business stakeholders that
were mentioned in the previous two assessments.
• Project Architecture/Component Diagram
o Provide technical details of the project, such as:
▪ the chosen programming language;
▪ any third-party libraries/tools used in the project;
▪ case diagrams;
▪ test-management (i.e., how you tested the developed application).
• Issues, Risk and Change Management
o Discuss how you managed the timelines, resources and team members.
• Individual Contribution
o Discuss the contribution you made to ensure the successful completion of the
report.
Page 3 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
o Discuss any issues and challenges you faced and how you managed to
overcome those issues and challenges individually and within your team.
• Conclusion and Future Works
o Provide concluding remarks on the project and discuss the future directions
of the project.
NOTE: As it is a group-based project, all team members can use the same report for
submission with the exception of the ‘Individual Contribution’ section.
As you are also required to present your work as part of this assessment, prepare 5–
6 PowerPoint slides for presentation purposes. Use the following structure for your slides,
which will also guide the presentation itself.
• Slide 1
o Mention the project title and group members’ names.
• Slide 2:
o Provide an overview of the project, including the developed features in the
project.
• Slide 3:
o Discuss any changes to the initial project plan that your team made during
the execution of the project.
• Slide 4:
o Discuss the individual contributions that each team member made to the
project.
• Slide 5:
o Discuss the possible future directions for the project and provide any
concluding remarks.
NOTE: As it is a group-based project, all team members can use the same slides with the
exception of the ‘Individual Contribution’ slide.
For presentation purposes every team member must record a 13–15-minute presentation
using the above-mentioned slides along with the demonstration of the developed project.
Record your presentation as an MP4 file for submission. If the file is large, ask your learning
facilitator for guidance.
Referencing
It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. For
more information on referencing, visit
https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool.
Page 4 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Submission Instructions
Ensure that all group members individually upload the group project.
For the top sheet of the written component of your project, provide a working project title
and a list of all your team members. Save the written component of your Assessment, and
submit it as the title of your submission using the following naming convention:
ATW306LastNameFirstNameAssessment3
Please save the video recording as an MP4 file, and submit it as the title of your submission
using the following naming convention:
ATW306LastNameFirstNameAssessment3_video.MP4
Please also include the source code for the project.
All files should be zipped into the one folder.
Submit this task via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in ATW306 Advanced
Tech: Work-Integrated Learning. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade
Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Before you submit your assessment, please ensure that you have read and understand the
conditions outlined in the Academic Integrity Code Handbook. If you are unsure about
anything in the Handbook, please reach out to your learning facilitator.
Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is
appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing
Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia
Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic
misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to
unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher
Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a
completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning
Facilitator
Page 5 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Assessment Rubric
Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0–49%
Pass
(Functional)
50–64%
Credit
(Proficient) 65– 74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75–84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional) 85– 100%
Effective
communication
(Presentation/Oral)
Difficult for the
audience to
understand and
follow; no
logical/clear
structure; poor flow
of ideas; arguments
lack supporting
evidence.
Specialised language
and terminology are
rarely or inaccurately
employed.
Stilted, awkward
and/or oversimplified
delivery.
Limited use of
engaging
presentation
techniques (e.g.,
posture, eye contact,
Presentation is
sometimes difficult to
follow. Information,
arguments and evidence
are presented in a way
that is not always clear
and logical.
Employs some
specialised language and
terminology with
accuracy.
Correct but often stilted
or awkward delivery.
Sometimes uses
engaging presentation
techniques (e.g.,
posture, eye contact,
gestures, volume and
pitch and pace of voice).
Presentation is easy to
follow. Information,
arguments and
evidence are well
presented. The flow of
ideas and arguments is
mostly clear.
Accurately employs
specialised language
and terminology.
Correct but
occasionally stilted or
awkward delivery.
Uses engaging
presentation
techniques (e.g.,
posture, eye contact;
gestures, volume and
pitch and pace of
voice).
Engages audience
interest. Information,
arguments and
evidence are very well
presented; the
presentation is logical,
clear and well
supported by evidence.
Accurately employs a
wide range of
specialised language
and terminology.
Clear and confident
delivery.
Confidently and
consistently uses a
range of engaging
presentation
techniques (e.g.,
posture, eye contact,
expression, gestures,
Engages and sustains
audience interest.
Expertly presented;
the presentation is
logical, persuasive,
well supported by
evidence and
demonstrates a clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
Discerningly selects
and precisely employs
a wide range of
specialised language
and terminology.
Clear, confident and
persuasive delivery.
Dynamic, integrated
and professional use of
a wide range of
engaging presentation
Page 6 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
gestures, volume and
pitch and pace of
voice).
volume, pitch and pace
of voice, stance, and
movement).
techniques (e.g.,
posture, eye contact,
expression, gestures;
volume, pitch and pace
of voice, stance and
movement).
Final report
composition
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
The document lacks
overall organisation.
The underlying logic
and flow of ideas is
generally limited.
Grammatical and
spelling errors
throughout the
document.
The document is
organised and clearly
written for the most
part. Limited logic
and/or flow of ideas in
some parts of the
document.
Grammatical and
spelling errors present in
some parts of the
document.
The document is
organised and clearly
written. The logic
and/or flow of ideas in
the document are easy
to follow for the most
part.
Vocabulary is well
chosen with some
minor improvements
needed.
Sentences are mostly
grammatically correct,
and/or only a few
spelling errors are
present.
The document is well
organised and clearly
written. The underlying
logic and/or flow of
ideas are easy to follow
throughout the
document.
Vocabulary is well
chosen and supports
reader comprehension.
Sentences are
grammatically correct
and free of spelling
errors.
The document is well
organised and clearly
written. The
underlying logic is
clearly articulated and
easy to follow
throughout the
document.
Vocabulary is chosen
that precisely
expresses the intended
meaning and supports
reader
comprehension.
Sentences are
grammatically correct
Page 7 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
and free of spelling
errors.
Contribution section
of the report
Percentage for this
criterion = 10%
Report is poorly
structured.
The report lacks a
great deal of details
about individual
contribution to the
preparation of the
plan and the
problems faced and
solved.
Report contains
several spelling and
grammatical
mistakes.
Some parts of the report
are structured well but
others are not.
A good level of detail is
given about individual
contribution, problems
faced and solutions.
Report contains some
grammatical/spelling
mistakes that interrupt
the flow of the
document.
Report is well
structured and
organised for the most
part.
Detailed description of
individual contribution
to the planning
process, problems
faced and solutions.
Report is well
structured and
organised overall.
Clearly identifies
individual contribution
to the whole planning
process with a detailed
description of the
problems faced,
solutions selected and
reasons for the choice
of these solutions.
Free of spelling and
grammatical mistakes.
Report is exceptional
in organisation and
structure.
Individual contribution
to the process is
described in an
exceptional way with
emphasis on the
important individual
contributions made to
the process. Very good
analysis of the
problems faced; good
discussion of the
proposed solutions
and good reasoning for
the choice of the
applied solution.
Sentences are
grammatically correct
and free of spelling
errors.
Page 8 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Project plan was
followed
Percentage for this
criterion = 25%
The developed
process plan was not
followed.
None of the
scheduled milestones
have been met.
Risks were not
analysed or managed.
Quality plan was not
followed/met.
The process plan was
slightly followed.
A few of the scheduled
milestones have been
met but most were not.
A few risks were
anticipated and
managed.
A few quality measures
were followed.
The process plan was
followed in most parts
of the project.
Most of the scheduled
milestones have been
met but a few were
not.
Most of the project
risks were anticipated
and managed.
Most of the quality
measures were
followed.
The process plan was
followed during the
whole project
development cycle.
Almost all the
scheduled milestones
have been met.
Almost all of the
project risks were
anticipated and
managed.
Almost all of the
quality measures were
followed.
The process plan was
followed in an
exceptional way with
very good attention to
each detail of the
process.
The scheduled
milestones have all
been met without
putting any extra
pressure/stress on the
development team.
Project risks were
exceptionally
anticipated and
managed in a very
good way.
Quality measures were
strictly followed, and
this is reflected in the
resultant software.
Page 9 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Software
application meets
project objectives
Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
Very little if any of
the project objectives
have been met in any
clear way.
The program did not
work or had many
bugs.
Some of the project
objectives (functional
and non-functional)
have been met.
The program produced
some correct results
and/or had several bugs.
The project objectives
(functional and non-
functional) have been
met but not in their
entirety, and/or there
were some clear
deficiencies.
The program produced
correct results for most
project specifications
and/or had few bugs.
The project objectives
(functional and non-
functional) have been
met with a few
exceptions that may be
questionable, and/or
there are additional
aspects that need to be
explored.
The program produced
the correct results and
displayed them
correctly for almost all
project specifications
with no bugs.
The project objects
(functional and non-
functional) have all
been addressed and all
aspects have been
explored.
The program meets all
the project
specifications with no
bugs.
Programming
knowledge
understanding and
quality of source
code
Demonstrated no or
limited ability to
make use of
appropriate third-
party libraries or
systems.
Demonstrated no or
limited programming
skills. Inappropriate
programming
Used some third-party
libraries or systems
appropriately.
Showed some basic
programming skills but
some inappropriate
programming
approaches have been
used.
Code is somewhat
readable but needed a
Reasonable use of
some third-party
libraries or systems but
lacked the capacity to
make use of them
and/or some choices
could have been better
in hindsight.
Showed reasonable
demonstration of
programming skills and
knowledge in terms of
Appropriate use of
some third-party
libraries or systems.
Showed reasonable
demonstration of
programming skills and
knowledge in terms of
data structures,
algorithms and other
applicable theories for
the most part and
showed some
Excellent choices of
third-party libraries or
systems and a clearly
established ability to
use them with few if
any limitations.
Consistently showed
application of
programming skills and
knowledge in terms of
data structures,
algorithms and other
Page 10 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
Percentage for this
criterion = 25%
approaches have
been used frequently.
Extremely hard to
read; little or no
attention to code
formatting; a lack of
logical organisation;
little or no
appreciation of
coding and
commenting
practices.
The program does not
check error
conditions.
lot of effort to
understand. Some
formatting is applied but
not consistent. Very few
comments were
provided.
The program checked
for few error conditions
and does handle them
appropriately.
data structures,
algorithms and other
applicable theories but
only in some parts.
Programming lacked
sophistication.
Reasonable clarity, and
code can be followed
with some effort.
Comments helped to
understand the code.
Logical organisation is
lacking in some areas
and there were a
number of
questionable
expressions.
The program checked
for some error
conditions and handled
them appropriately.
sophistication in
programming skills.
Good standard of
coding and
commenting were
evident. Code is easy
to read but some
expressions need
improvement.
Commenting is evident
and code is somewhat
easy to maintain.
The program checked
for most error
conditions and handled
them appropriately.
applicable theories.
Where appropriate,
showed sophistication
and a high-level
appreciation of
programming
intricacies.
High standard of
coding and
commenting was
consistently applied.
The code is easy to
read and maintain.
The program checked
for all error conditions
and handled them
appropriately.
Page 11 of 11 ATW306_Assessment 3 Option 2_20240603
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a)
Demonstrate interpersonal skills by prioritising competing demands to achieve personal goals and well-developed judgement
and responsibility in professional practice.
SLO b) Apply planning, problem solving and decision-making skills within the context of professional practice.
SLO c) Utilise software engineering methodologies to evaluate solutions for efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability.
SLO d) Identify ethical implications of professional practice.
SLO e) Reflect on opportunities within professional practice to engage in independent lifelong learning.
SLO f) Communicate effectively in ways appropriate to the discipline, client, audience and purpose.
51作业君版权所有
