代写辅导接单-CHAPTER 5 -

欢迎使用51辅导,51作业君孵化低价透明的学长辅导平台,服务保持优质,平均费用压低50%以上! 51fudao.top

CHAPTER 5 THE PHYSICIAN LABOR MARKET Econ3004/ Econ6039 Health Economics, 2023 Semester 2 Dr Yijuan Chen, Australian National University Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Outline  The training of physicians Medical school & residency  Returns to medical training Work hours  Barriers to entry  Physician agency  Physician-induced demand  Defensive medicine

The training of physicians Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Medical school  Entry into med school is competitive and

selective worldwide  In the US, average 50% of applicants are accepted into

at least one school. UC San Diego, for example,

received 6767 applications in 2011 for 149 slots.  In 2004, there were over twice as many applicants as

spaces at the UK medical schools.  Medical school can be super-expensive

US: $140k -- $225k for four years European medical training often is heavily

subsidized Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Medical school  Length of medical school varies across country  US & Canada applicants must first get a bachelor’s degree  Applicants need to have completed a pre-medical curriculum

of biology, physics, chemistry, mathematics, and English.  The Doctor of Medicine (MD) program usually last 4 years.

 European applicants go directly from high school  The medical program lasts 5 years in the UK, and 6-7 years in

France  Australian medical schools offer both Bachelor and Doctoral

degrees  Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS), usual

duration 6 years

 Doctor of Medicine (MD), usual duration 4 years Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Medical school  There are about 20 medical schools in Australia Medical School Affiliation Established

in Website Melbourne

Medical School University of

Melbourne 1862 http://medicine.unimelb .edu.au Sydney Medical

School University of

Sydney 1883 http://sydney.edu.au/m edicine University of

Adelaide Medical

School University of

Adelaide

1885 http://health.adelaide.e du.au/medicine/ UQ School of

Medicine

University of

Queensland

1936 https://medicine.uq.edu .au/ ANU Medical

School ANU 2004 http://medicalschool.an u.edu.au Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Residency  In many countries, in addition to classroom work,

physicians-in-training must also gain hospital

experience  Residency is a period of on-the-job training following

medical school, of which the duration is usually 3+ years.  The first year of residency is often called internship, after

which doctors-to-be can apply for their license to

practice medicine.

 After the residency, some doctors will further continue

their training in sub-specialties, which may take another

2-3 years, or even 5 years (e.g. cardiac surgery).

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Residency Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Residency  New residents lack experience, and when new

residents arrive at a hospital, empirical evidence

shows that medical errors go up  “July effect” in the US  “August killing season” in the UK

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Physician work-hours  Work hours  Over 60 hours a week  On call residents could work up to 30 consecutive hours  In 2003, implementation to limit number of hours/week for

US residents  No more than 80 hours a week  No more than 24 consecutive hours  Empirical evidence suggests no change in patient mortality.  But there may be changes on non-fatal outcomes which

have not been studied. Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Work-hour tradeoffs  Longer work-hours  Pros:

 more learning and accumulation of experience;

 an in-patient may remain with the same doctor during her entire stay, and

thus receive more complete care  Cons: Fatigue may impair physicians’ cognitive abilities and in turn

may affect patient health  Shorter work-hours  Requires more hand-offs by physicians and thus greater chance for

error Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Shorter hours leads to fewer errors

 Landrigan (2004) conducted randomized experiment

at Brigham and Woman’s ICU at Harvard  2 groups of interns: traditional hours (80 hours/week) &

short work week (60 hours/week)  Traditional hour group  Committed 36% more serious medical errors  21% more medication errors  5.6 times more diagnostic errors  Patient outcomes do not differ significantly  Senior physicians intercepted most serious errors Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Shorter hours leads to fewer errors

 However, one may argue that the less chance to make

mistakes also means the less chance to learn.  A zero-work-hour intern will make zero error!

 Thus one can conjecture that reducing residents’ work- hours may reduce errors by residents at the expense of

increasing errors by recent graduates of residency

programs.

Returns to medical training Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Returns to medical training  Unlike most occupations,

returns to medical

training are very back- loaded  Medical school & residency

expensive in direct costs

and opportunity costs  So those who choose

being physician are

patient enough to value

future returns

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Net present value  Net present value is a way of calculating value of all

future streams of income (from today’s perspective)  Discount factor δ is a measure of how much less an

individual values future income over present income  δ lies between 0 and 1; small if impatient and large if

patient  Those with high δ have high NPV from being a physician  Those with low δ have low NPV (and maybe even

negative NPV) Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Discount factor  Another way of expressing discount factor is: Where r is the discount rate, analogous to the

market interest rate that would make a person with

discount factor δ indifferent between saving for

tomorrow and spending today  Ex: δ = 0.90 corresponds with r = 0.11  High patience means a high discount factors δ

and a low discount rate r δ = 1/(1+r) Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return (IRR)  Consider two possible career choices P and S with incomes

paths Ip and Is  Internal rate of return r* is the discount rate which

equalizes the NPV of both careers (or the difference

between NPV(p) – NPV(s) = 0 )

 Someone with IRR of r* values career P and career S exactly equally

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return (IRR) Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return  IRR in medicine is typically between 11% and 14%!

 Significantly higher than market interest rate  This is true for dentists and lawyers too  IRR may be even higher for medical specialists like

neurosurgeons and immunologists

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return  The fact that the IRR has stayed high is curious  It suggests that being a physician is highly lucrative Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Internal rate of return  The fact that the IRR has stayed high is curious  Why hasn’t the high income attracted more physicians,

which would have pushed the IRR back down to market

levels?

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Barriers to entry Barriers to entry may explain the high IRR  In 19th century, becoming a doctor was simple  Anyone could do it, no regulation about training  American Medical Association (1847)  Pre-req’s for medical school  4 years medical school  Require doctors to have a license to practice  1910 Flexner Report helped shut down low-quality med schools

 Caps on medical school class size

 Caps on residency program enrollment  Result: fewer medical schools and fewer medical students Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Tradeoffs from barriers to entry  Because of barriers to entry, consumers have to pay

above the competitive price  Physicians therefore earn monopoly rents  Def. wages above the competitive price due to artificial

constraint of the market  On the other hand, barriers to entry ensures that

physicians are qualified  The monopoly rents the patients pay for good health

care may outweigh the patients’ cost to search for good

health care in a more competitive market

Physician agents Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Physicians as agents  Patients trust physicians to act as perfect agents

for their health  Doctors’ foremost concern should be patients’ well- being Not their own financial status or reputation  Are doctors always perfect agents for their

patients?

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Physician-induced demand (PID)  Information asymmetry between doctor and

patient  Patients cannot assess whether an extra test or

procedure ordered by doctor is necessary

 Doctors may have the financial incentive to

prescribe more services than needed Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Physician-induced demand (PID)  Hickson et al. (1987) randomly assigned a group

of pediatric residents to be either paid by a fixed

salary or paid according to the amount of service

provided (fee-for-service)  The “fee-for-service” group scheduled more visits

per patient:  than the fixed-salary group.

 than recommended by the American Academy of

Pediatrics Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Physician-induced demand (PID)  Empirical studies also find that  Thoracic surgeons compensated for a round of cuts to

Medicare fees in 1990 by performing more surgeries. ( Yip

1998)  Physicians who recently became owners of back and spine

clinics recommended more surgeries than before they opened

their own clinics. (Mitchell , 2008)

 Physicians who owned their own MRI machines ordered more

MRI tests than those who had to refer patients to outside MRI

scans. (Baker 2010) Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Physician-induced demand (PID)  The existence of PID poses a challenge to insurers:  Setting high reimbursement could lead to doctors to over

prescribe certain procedures.  Setting low reimbursement could cause the doctors to

substitute the appropriate procedure by other, more

lucrative, procedures.

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Defensive medicine  Doctors fearful of lawsuit may overprescribe (and

overcharge) for only marginally-useful procedures  Between 1991 and 2005, 7.4% of all US physicians

covered by a large liability insurer faced at least one

medical malpractice lawsuit. The average payout on

successful claims was $274,887.

(Jena, et al. 2011)

 Mello et al. (2010) estimate that medical liability

system in the US costs $55.6 billion annually

Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Defensive medicine  Studdert et al. (2005) show that, Among the high-risk

practitioners in Pennsylvania, USA  93% of surveyed doctors reported practicing defensive

medicine.

 59% conducted more diagnostic tests than they thought

were medically necessary.  39% avoided caring for high-risk patients in order to

reduce their exposure to liability. Bhattacharya, Hyde and Tu – Health Economics Conclusion  Physician supply highly regulated  Leads to a shortage of doctors  Hard for other health care providers to fill the void  Investment returns to being a doctor and

specializing is very high  Physicians are not always perfect agents of care  Overutilization of care  Physician-induced demand and defensive medicine 51作业君版权所有

51作业君

Email:51zuoyejun

@gmail.com

添加客服微信: Fudaojun0228