代写辅导接单-ECON7200 -

欢迎使用51辅导,51作业君孵化低价透明的学长辅导平台,服务保持优质,平均费用压低50%以上! 51fudao.top

ECON7200 Essay Marking Rubric – Semester 2, 2023

(Marks for each part are given in parentheses, 30 marks in total)

Criteria 4 3 2 1 0

Task 1 - Summary (4) Clear and precise

summary, with all

main points of the

article mentioned and

explained

Good summary,

though one main

point is missing, or

poorly explained

Adequate summary,

though more than

one main points are

missing, or poorly

explained

The summary is

incoherent and/or

irrelevant. Some

main points are

missing, or poorly

explained

No summary given

Task 2 (6)

- Definition (2)

A clear definition of

both EMH and

behavioural finance

are given

A definition of one

concept is not

given, or poorly

explained

No definition given

- EMH and asset price

bubble (2)

Clear explanation to

show how EMH can

be used to explain

asset price bubble,

with good use of

research to reflect

the arguments.

Satisfactory

explanation, though

some arguments can

be weak, or not

supported by

evidence.

No attempt shown

- Behavioural finance and

asset price bubble (2)

Clear explanation to

show how

behavioural finance

can be used to

explain asset price

bubble, with good

use of research.

Satisfactory

explanation, though

some arguments can

be weak, or not

supported by

evidence.

No attempt shown

Criteria 4 3 2 1 0

Task 3 (10)

- Discussing the author’s

statement (4)

Very clear and

insightful discussion.

The arguments are

valid, and both sides

of the argument are

given, and discussed

in detail

Good discussion,

though some

arguments are

flawed. Both sides

of the argument are

given and discussed

Flawed discussion

overall, with some

irrelevant

arguments. Both

sides of the

argument are

mentioned

Very flawed

discussion, and not

all sides of the

argument are

discussed

No attempt shown

- Student’s conclusion (2)

The conclusion is

clear, and is

relevant to the

discussion above

The conclusion is

not very clear, or

not very related to

the discussion

above

No, unclear, or

irrelevant

conclusion given

- Evidence/application of

research (4)

Excellent evidence of

research, with

arguments supported

by highly suitable

and relevant sources

Good evidence of

research, with most

arguments

supported by

suitable and

relevant sources

Flawed evidence of

research, with some

arguments not

supported by

suitable and

relevant sources

Some key

arguments are not

supported by

relevant sources,

reflecting a lack of

depth in reading

and/or choice of

suitable sources

No, or very

inconsequential

evidence of further

research

Criteria 4 3 2 1 0

Writing quality (5)

- Essay format (1)

Clear, and relevant

introduction and

conclusion

No, or irrelevant

introduction or

conclusion given

- Writing style (1)

Academic writing

style is used, with a

good flow between

paragraphs,

sections, or

discussion points

Academic writing

style is not used, or

there is no essay

flow between

paragraphs,

sections, or

discussion points

- Grammar/Structural

clarity (3)

Both grammar and

spelling are faultless

throughout the

essay

There are

occasional

grammatical and/or

spelling errors but

these do not affect

readability of the

essay

Spelling and/or

grammar is

consistently

incorrect, hindering

the report's ‘flow’

and readability.

The grammar and

spelling are too poor

to make sense of

most of the essay

Presentation (1)

The essay has a

cover page,

detailing name,

student ID, and

word count

Not all details are

given, or the word

limit is not followed

Criteria 4 3 2 1 0

Reference (4)

- Reference style (2)

Reference style,

including reference

list and in-text

citations, is

consistent, and the

reference list is

alphabetically

ordered

Reference style,

including reference

list and in-text

citations, is mostly

consistent with

some errors, or the

reference list is

alphabetically

ordered

Inconsistent, or

incorrect reference

style

Important note:

even if students

use the reference

tools from

database such as

UQ Library or

Google Scholar,

please double

check them as they

might be incorrect

- Reference quality (2)

Quality academic

and/or news sources

are chosen, which

greatly support the

arguments

Flawed/missing

reference list and/or

irrelevant/missing

in-text citations

Inconsequential, or

no reference given

51作业君版权所有

51作业君

Email:51zuoyejun

@gmail.com

添加客服微信: Fudaojun0228