程序辅导案例 > Program >

代写辅导接单-A3 Rubric

欢迎使用51辅导，51作业君孵化低价透明的学长辅导平台，服务保持优质，平均费用压低50%以上！ 51fudao.top

A3 Rubric

NOTE: All rubric columns are provided as guidelines for the marks you can expect. In reality, every rubric item can receive any mark

within 0.5 increments from 0 to the maximum possible mark.

Common mistakes are listed for you to check against your code, but not all are weighted equally, not all common mistakes are listed.

Code Submission - 50 Marks

Poor Performance Weak Performance Average Performance Good Performance Great Performance

Task 1 - The Runners Are Here - 10 marks

Approach More than 2 major mistakes At most 1 major mistake NO major mistakes NO major mistakes NO major mistakes

OR OR AND AND AND

More than 4 minor mistakes At most 4 minor mistakes At most 3 minor mistakes At most 2 minor mistakes At most 1 minor mistakes

Some examples: Major Mistakes

E Nr or to r c hn eo ct kra inis ge pd r w e-h ce or ne d i it t iw onas s supposed to be raised [0 Marks] [0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks] [2 Marks] [2.5 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes

Incorrect type of error raised

Incorrect pre-condition checked

Automated Tests Passing no given tests Passing at least half of the given Passing all given tests but failing all Passing all given tests but failing at Passes all tests; given and extended,

tests. extended tests least one extended test code is very robust.

S Fao ilm inge t he ex a prm ovp idl ee d M tei ss t t ca ak see ss [0 Marks] [0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks] [2 Marks] [2.5 Marks]

Failing hidden tests

Student Tests No additional tests added / tests are Not enough tests added for at least 1 At least half of the given functions A maximum of 1 given method Good quality tests added for every

of poor quality given function / tests are of poor have extra proper quality tests added doesn't have additional good quality given function

S No otm cre ea e tix na g m enp oule g hM teis stt sa fk ore as function [0 Marks] quality for at least 1 given function [1.5 Marks] tests [2.5 Marks]

[0.5 Mark] [2 Marks]

Documentation No documentation provided, or Minimal or unclear documentation. Average documentation with some Good documentation with clear Excellent documentation that is

extremely poor and unhelpful. Provides little insight and may be useful comments and explanations. explanations and consistent use of thorough, clear, and informative.

S Mo ism sine g e inx -la inm e cp ol mes m: eM nta s j io n r o nM ei os rt a sek ve ers al parts [0 Marks] inconsistent or incorrect. Lacks detail or clarity in certain areas.c ao rem asm foe rn it ms a pn rod v d eo mc est nr tin ing s c. lM ari in tyo or r C ano dn s mist ae inn tt aly in e an bh ila itn yc .es readability

Missing docstrings in one or multiple functions [0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks] detail.

[2.5 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes [2 Marks]

Incorrect in-line comments in one or several parts

Missing parts of docstrings (each one counts as one minor

mistake)

Task 2 - At The Races - 12.5 marks

Approach More than 2 major mistakes At most 1 major mistake NO major mistakes NO major mistakes NO major mistakes

OR OR AND AND AND

More than 4 minor mistakes At most 4 minor mistakes At most 3 minor mistakes At most 2 minor mistakes At most 1 minor mistakes

Some examples: Major Mistakes

E Nr or to r c hn eo ct kra inis ge pd r w e-h ce or ne d i it t iw onas s supposed to be raised [0 Marks] [1 Mark] [2 Marks] [3 Marks] [4 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes

Incorrect type of error raised

Incorrect pre-condition checked

Tests Passing no given tests Passing at least half of the given Passing all given tests but failing all Passing all given tests but failing at Passes all tests; given and extended,

tests. extended tests least one extended test code is very robust.

S Fao ilm inge t he ex a prm ovp idl ee d M tei ss t t ca ak see ss [0 Marks] [1 Mark] [2 Marks] [3 Marks] [4 Marks]

Failing hidden tests

Student Tests No additional tests added / tests are Not enough tests added for at least 1 At least half of the given functions A maximum of 1 given method Good quality tests added for every

of poor quality given function / tests are of poor have extra proper quality tests added doesn't have additional good quality given function

S No otm cre ea e tix na g m enp oule g hM teis stt sa fk ore as function [0 Marks] quality for at least 1 given function [1 Marks] tests [2 Marks]

[0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks]

Documentation No documentation provided, or Minimal or unclear documentation. Average documentation with some Good documentation with clear Excellent documentation that is

extremely poor and unhelpful. Provides little insight and may be useful comments and explanations. explanations and consistent use of thorough, clear, and informative.

Missing docstrings in one or multiple functions [0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks] detail.

[2.5 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes [2 Marks]

Incorrect in-line comments in one or several parts

Missing parts of docstrings (each one counts as one minor

mistake)

Task 3 - Competition - 12.5 marks

Approach More than 2 major mistakes At most 1 major mistake NO major mistakes NO major mistakes NO major mistakes

OR OR AND AND AND

More than 4 minor mistakes At most 4 minor mistakes At most 3 minor mistakes At most 2 minor mistakes At most 1 minor mistakes

Some examples: Major Mistakes

E Nr or to r c hn eo ct kra inis ge pd r w e-h ce or ne d i it t iw onas s supposed to be raised [0 Marks] [1 Mark] [2 Marks] [3 Marks] [4 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes

Incorrect type of error raised

Incorrect pre-condition checked

Tests Passing no given tests Passing at least half of the given Passing all given tests but failing all Passing all given tests but failing at Passes all tests; given and extended,

tests. extended tests least one extended test code is very robust.

S Fao ilm inge t he ex a prm ovp idl ee d M tei ss t t ca ak see ss [0 Marks] [1 Mark] [2 Marks] [3 Marks] [4 Marks]

Failing hidden tests

Student Tests No additional tests added / tests are Not enough tests added for at least 1 At least half of the given functions A maximum of 1 given method Good quality tests added for every

of poor quality given function / tests are of poor have extra proper quality tests added doesn't have additional good quality given function

S No otm cre ea e tix na g m enp oule g hM teis stt sa fk ore as function [0 Marks] quality for at least 1 given function [1 Marks] tests [2 Marks]

[0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks]

Documentation No documentation provided, or Minimal or unclear documentation. Average documentation with some Good documentation with clear Excellent documentation that is

extremely poor and unhelpful. Provides little insight and may be useful comments and explanations. explanations and consistent use of thorough, clear, and informative.

Missing docstrings in one or multiple functions [0.5 Mark] [1.5 Marks] detail.

[2.5 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes [2 Marks]

Incorrect in-line comments in one or several parts

Missing parts of docstrings (each one counts as one minor

mistake)

Task 4 - It All Comes Together - 15 marks

Approach More than 2 major mistakes At most 1 major mistake NO major mistakes NO major mistakes NO major mistakes

OR OR AND AND AND

More than 4 minor mistakes At most 4 minor mistakes At most 3 minor mistakes At most 2 minor mistakes At most 1 minor mistakes

Some examples: Major Mistakes

S Eo nm tire e e cr or do ers w n ro itt t h enan ind l med ain [0 Marks] [1.5 Mark] [2.5 Marks] [3.5 Marks] [5 Marks]

Program does not execute

Some examples: Minor Mistakes

Code repetition

Input not asked for multiple runners

Competition terminates incorrectly

Testing by the TAs Code fails easily for multiple inputs Code passes less than 25% of input Code passes between 25% and 50% Code passes between 50% and 75% Code passes between 75% and 100%

combinations of input combinations of input combinations of input combinations

S Fao ilm inge t he ex a prm ovp idl ee d M tei ss t t ca ak see ss [0 Marks] [1.5 Mark] [2.5 Marks] [3.5 Marks] [5 Marks]

Failing hidden tests

Documentation No documentation provided, or Minimal or unclear documentation. Average documentation with some Good documentation with clear Excellent documentation that is

extremely poor and unhelpful. Provides little insight and may be useful comments and explanations. explanations and consistent use of thorough, clear, and informative.

Missing docstrings in one or multiple functions [1.5 Mark] [2.5 Marks] detail.

[5 Marks]

Some examples: Minor Mistakes [3.5 Marks]

Incorrect in-line comments in one or several parts

Missing parts of docstrings (each one counts as one minor

mistake)

Penalties

Formatting Penalty Some or all of the common mistakes No issues

made.

[0 Marks]

Some Common Mistakes Anywhere from -1 to -5 Marks

Code not submitted through Ed.

Files renamed, or corrupt files uploaded.

Some scaffold files removed

Late Penalty

Late penalties will be applied according to this slide: https://edstem.org/au/courses/14313/lessons/52880/slides/359275

Common Mistakes

Submitting Late