程序代写案例-MATH3871/MATH5970

MATH3871/MATH5970
Bayesian Inference and Computation
Tutorial Problems 1
These exercises provide some practice in performing basic Bayesian analyses
.
1) Water consumption
Water consumption
Water use
More than 5 million ML of water is used in Victoria each year, 90% from surface
water and 10% from groundwater. The majority of Victoria’s water resource is
used for irrigation (78%), while urban uses (both metropolitan and regional)
account for 17% of Victoria’s water consumption.
Efficiency of water use2
Making the best use of our water resource
CSIRO has provided a perspective on water use which is related to the
contribution it makes to Gross National Expenditure (GNE). The prices we pay
for agricultural products tend not to take into account the full environmental
costs of production. When water inputs are considered there is variation in
the amount of water used to produce various commodities. For example,
rice production uses more than 8,000 litres of water for every dollar of GNE,
compared to cereal production which uses around 600 litres to produce the
same value of product.2
Trends in water consumption
While time-series water consumption data are not available for regional Victoria,
records for Melbourne show that per capita water consumption grew steadily
between the 1940s and 1960s, with strong increases in the 1970s. Since the
1980s water consumption has been influenced by drought, and associated water
restrictions, as well as by conservation and efficiency incentives and market
reforms designed to reduce water consumption over the longer term.3
Average daily per capita water use4
Melbourne 1940-2004*
* NOTE: Figure for 2003-04 is forecasted estimation
Consumptive uses of water in Victoria1
2003-04
BTRc^a ;XcaTb^UfPcTa_Ta^U6a^bb=PcX^]P[4g_T]SXcdaT
AXRT
2^cc^]
3PXahBdVPaRP]T
3PXah_a^SdRcb
1TTU
5[^daRTaTP[U^^Sb
BTaeXRTbc^PVaXRd[cdaT
'#'
% #
#\$!
!#&
'\$!
&"
% '
\$'#
Sources 1DSE 2005 State Water Report 2CSIRO and University of Sydney 2005 Balancing Act. A Triple Bottom Line Analysis of the Australian Economy 3Victorian Government 2004 Securing Our Water Future
Together 4Melbourne Water 2005 A Dry History
&

8aaXVPcX^]
ATVX^]P[DaQP]
&'
\$
1 9
4 0
1 9
4 2
1 9
4 4
1 9
4 6
1 9
4 8
1 9
5 0
1 9
5 2
1 9
5 4
1 9
5 6
1 9
5 8
1 9
6 0
1 9
6 2
1 9
6 4
1 9
6 6
1 9
6 8
1 9
7 0
1 9
7 2
1 9
7 4
1 9
7 6
1 9
7 8
1 9
8 0
1 9
8 2
1 9
8 4
1 9
8 6
1 9
8 8
1 9
9 0
1 9
9 2
1 9
9 4
1 9
9 6
1 9
9 8
2 0
0 0
2 0
0 2
2 0
0 4
Financial Year Ending
L i
t r
e s
p
e r
p
e r
s o
n
p e
r
d a
y
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Drought Years
Water Restrictions
Mid 1990s:
COAG Water
Reforms - Pricing
measures introduced
86
NOTE: These data are for
Australia overall. Cotton is
not grown in Victoria and rice
represents less than 1% of
the State’s grain production
(as at 2001 Agricultural
Census)
I the Melbo rne average daily per capita water use analyis, we modelled the discrete observa-
tions x1, . . . , xn as independent draws from a Poisson(θ) distribution. Assuming a Gamma(α, β)
p ior, which has a density function of
pi(θ) =
βα
Γ(α)
θα−1 exp(−βθ), for α, β, γ > 0,
we computed the posterior as a Gamma (α +
∑n
i=1 xi, β + n) distribution.
(a) Show that the posterior mean of θ is given by
α+

i xi
β+n
.
(b) Show that the posterior variance of θ is given by
α+

i xi
(β+n)2
.
(e) Show that the predictive distribution for a future observation, y, is
NegBin
(
y | α +∑i xi, 1β+n+1), where the probability mass function of a Negative Bino-
mial random variable with parameters a > 0, and 0 ≤ p ≤ 1, is given by
pi(y | a, p) =
(
y + a− 1
y
)
(1− p)apy.
1
2) Rock Strata
(a) Rock strata A and B are difficult to distinguish in the field. Through careful laboratory
studies it has been determined that the only characteristic which might be useful in
aiding discrimination is the presence or absence of a particular brachiopod fossil. In rock
exposures of the size usually encountered, the probabilities of fossil presence are found to
be as in the table below. It is also known that rock type A occurs about four times as
often as type B in this area of study.
Stratum Fossil present Fossil absent
A 0.9 0.1
B 0.2 0.8
If a sample is taken, and the fossil found to be present, calculate the posterior distribution
of rock types.
(b) If the geologist always classifies as A when the fossil is found to be present, and classifies
as B when it is absent, what is the probability she will be correct in a future classification?
3) Coloured Balls
(a) Repeat the Coloured Balls example from Lecture 1, using a different choice of prior
distribution. In what way does this change of prior affect the posterior probability of no
black balls left in the bag?
2

Email:51zuoyejun

@gmail.com