Marking Rubric for COMM5615 Assignment 2: Modelling Growth & Diffusion Dynamics and Testing Alternative Strategies

Each question in Assignment 2 is worth 25% and your answers to each question will be assessed using the following criteria:

Criteria Weight Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
Effective
application of
systems
modelling and
simulation
analyses
50% Application of
systems
modelling and
simulation
analyses is
below the
minimum
expected level.
Acceptable
application of systems
modelling and
simulation analyses,
but includes
substantial errors or
omissions. Provides
some graphs and
analysis of simulation
results that help
understand the
dynamics.
Good application of
systems modelling and
simulation analyses.
Provides most important
graphs and analysis of
simulation results that help
understand the dynamics.
More comprehensive
understanding of model
behaviour could have been
drawn from additional
graphs and analyses.
Superior application
of systems modelling
and simulation
analyses. All graphs
necessary to
understand
dynamics included
and strong analysis
of model results to
explain dynamics
over time.
Outstanding and insightful
command of systems
modelling and analyses
demonstrating a deep
understanding of the
model and associated
dynamic behaviour.
Insightful and well-
integrated build-up of
simulation results and
analysis that fully explain
the dynamics.
Quality and logic
of explanations /
descriptions of
simulation results
30% Explanations of
simulation
results (i.e.,
dynamic
behaviour) not
logical or
compelling.
Attempts to provide
some logical
explanations of
simulation results,
though links between
feedback structure
and dynamics
intermittent or unclear.
Some key information
missing, superficial,
irrelevant or incorrect.
Explanations of simulation
results and the connection
to the feedback structure
mostly logical and
compelling, but could have
been more thorough.
Explanations include
relevant model variables
and feedback loops.
Strong logical and
compelling
explanations of how
simulation results are
driven by the
feedback structure.
Thorough
explanations that
include all relevant
model variables and
feedback loops.
Outstanding logical and
compelling explanations
of simulation results.
Persuasive explanations
are thorough and build
confidence about how
each relevant model
variable and feedback
loop drive dynamic
behaviour.
Written
communication:
organisation,
clarity and
grammar

20% Not organised,
lacking clarity of
expression, and
includes many
grammatical
errors.
Acceptable
organisation,
coherence and clarity
of expression.
Mostly well organised,
clearly written, and correct
use of grammar.
Exhibits careful
attention to detail in
terms of
organisation, clarity,
and grammar.
Ideas presented in a
polished, articulate, and
professional manner with
high clarity of expression.


欢迎咨询51作业君