PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 1 of 7 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title PRO100 Information Systems Project Management Assessment Reflection & Presentation Individual/Group Individual / Group Length 1000/1500 words (+/- 10%) & 10/15 minutes Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: c) Apply PM concepts to IS projects within various organisations d) Effectively communicate project status to stakeholders throughout the project life cycle Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT end of Module 6.2 (Week 12) Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks Task Summary In this assessment task, you will progress your real-world scenario project from Assessment 2 to the Closing process of the project life cycle and present a final report of your project. You will also reflect on your learning journey in this subject. Context As a Project Manager, you are the voice of the projects you manage. This will require you to oversee the successful delivery of projects in managing organisation and stakeholder expectations as well as communicate effectively with key stakeholders throughout the project life cycle including executive leadership teams and other stakeholders in the organisation. In closing a project, it is vital that you present a final report to the key stakeholders informing them of the overall success and performance of the project. In an industry that collaborates globally you will need to be prepared to present either face-to-face in a boardroom or virtually via collaboration platforms such as Collaborate Ultra, Microsoft Teams, Webex, or Zoom. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 2 of 7 Reflective practice is a process of thinking about new experiences gained and reflecting on them with a view of learning from these experiences. Reflection needs to be drawn from the experience and deep thinking applied to determine what worked well, what did not and how better results could be achieved. It enables you to increase your understanding and gain new insights about yourself, others and situations. These new insights may lead to a change of thinking or behaviour with the aim of improving results in the future. As group work is often a key development area for students, reflection is considered a key part of this learning process. Consider how the group work experience from this subject be taken forward to the next group assignment experience to achieve positive collaboration outcomes. In Project Management, teamwork and collaboration form a key part of working on projects. Documenting and reflecting on project lessons learned provide future project teams with information that can enhance their efficiency and effectiveness as they build on the experience gained from each completed project. Successful reflection facilitates self-awareness, personal and professional growth, and lifetime learning. This will help you develop into an active learner and become a reflective practitioner in your professional life. Part A: Presentation Task Instructions Progress your real-world scenario project from Assessment 2 to completion. As part of closing the project, you are required to prepare and deliver a Final Report presentation to the Project Sponsor and Executive Leadership team of the organisation. Your presentation should address the following: • The overall success/failure and performance of the project. • The organisation and administration of the project. • Tools and techniques used to accomplish results. • Strengths and weaknesses of the approach taken. • Recommendations and limitations. • Key lessons learned. Requirements of the presentation The total presentation should be no more than 15 minutes (10 minutes for individual or 15 minutes for group presentation). There is no recommended number of slides. A suggested structure for the slides is outlined below: • Presentation title (include the title of the presentation, student name(s) and student ID(s)). • Presentation purpose (specify the purpose of the presentation). • Presentation outline (provide an outline of the structure/sequence of the presentation). • Presentation body (explain the main points to be presented). • Conclusion (summarise the key points presented). • References (in APA Referencing style). PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 3 of 7 The presentation may be conducted face-to-face in class or virtually using a collaboration platform stipulated by the University or the Learning Facilitator. Please refer the Academic Skills unit in Blackboard for more information on giving presentations. Group Presentation Requirements (if applicable) • All group members must present for the presentation. • For authentication purposes, all group members must show their face in virtual presentations when presenting. Part B: Reflection Task Instructions Reflect on your individual and group work learning experience from this subject. Reflection needs to be drawn from the experience and deep thinking applied to determine what worked well, what did not and how better outcomes could be achieved. Consider how these new insights may lead to a change of thinking or behaviour with the aim of improving results in the future. Requirements of the reflection The written reflection should be no more than 1500 words (+/- 10%) (1000 words for individual or 1500 words for group reflection). The reflection should cover: • What key knowledge and skills have you learned through this subject? • How will they benefit your further study and career? • Any Good, Bad or Ugly individual and group work learning experience? • What will you do to achieve better learning outcomes? Referencing There are requirements for referencing the presentation and written reflection using APA referencing style. Please see more information on referencing here: http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing a. It is expected that you reference any source used. b. You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assessment. This rubric will give you a clear picture of what a successful presentation and report look like. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 4 of 7 Assessment Criteria Your answers will be assessed against the following criteria: • A presentation addressing the key points covered in a project Final Report • A written reflection of your individual and group work learning experience from this subject • Use of Academic Conventions in APA Referencing style. Submission Instructions Please submit ONE presentation slide deck and ONE written reflection in MS Word format via the Assessment 3 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Academic Integrity Declaration I/we declare that except where I/we have referenced, the work I/we are submitting for this assessment task is my/our own work. I/we have read and am/are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms I/we am/are aware that I/we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I/we will do so accordingly. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 5 of 7 Assessment Rubric Part A: Presentation Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Use of visual aids Visual aids support the spoken message. Title page included. Appropriate use of text. Use of colour, layout, clarity, and neatness of visual aids. 10% Presentation slides either not used or not relevant/related to the spoken message. No title slide included. Overuse of text with significant spelling mistakes. Presentation slides require significant improvement in design, colour choice, layout, and neatness. Presentation slides mainly supported the spoken message. Title slide included. Appropriate use of text with some spelling mistakes. Presentation slides require some improvement in design, colour choice, layout, and neatness. Presentation slides supported the spoken message effectively. Title slide included. Appropriate use of text with minimal spelling mistakes. Presentation slides demonstrated an acceptable level of design, colour choice, layout, and neatness. Presentation slides were carefully prepared and reinforced the spoken message effectively. Title slide included. Appropriate use of text with no spelling mistakes. Presentation slides added impact and interest to the presentation through the use of good design and layout to support the flow of information. Presentation slides were expertly prepared and reinforced the spoken message effectively. Title slide included. Appropriate use of text with no spelling mistakes. Presentation slides had an excellent design and layout that supported the flow of Information. All the required elements were well placed and clearly defined. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 6 of 7 Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Understands the organisation and problem(s) to be addressed. Apply PM concepts to IS projects within various organisations. Effectively communicate project status to stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. 30% Lack of understanding of the organisation and problem(s) to be addressed. Lack of consideration and application of PM concepts to IS projects. Lack of communication strategy. Limited understanding of the organisation and problem(s) to be addressed. Demonstrates a limited consideration and application of PM concepts to IS projects. Limited implementation of communication strategy that only in part addresses the needs of stakeholders Adequate knowledge and understanding of the organisation and problem(s) to be addressed. Demonstrates an acceptable consideration and application of PM concepts to IS projects. Reasonable implementation of strategy that addresses most of the communication needs of all stakeholders. Demonstrates thorough knowledge and understanding of the organisation and problem(s) to be addressed. Demonstrates significant consideration and application of PM concepts to IS projects Implements a well- developed, resolved strategy to address complete communication needs of all stakeholders. Demonstrates expert knowledge and understanding of the organisation and problem(s) to be addressed. Demonstrates expert consideration and application of PM concepts to IS projects. Implements a sophisticated, resolved strategy that explicitly addresses complete communication needs of all stakeholders. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 7 of 7 Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Effective Communication Ability to engage the audience. Clarity, pace, and fluency. Clear and logical structure. 30% Techniques used to engage audience are minimal, or ineffective. Presenter(s) were frequently unclear throughout the presentation. Poor fluency of delivery Difficult to understand, lacking logical and clear structure. Adequately engages audience throughout some of but not all of the presentation. Presenter(s) spoke clearly throughout most of the presentation to ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was mostly fluent. Information, arguments, and evidence were presented in a way that was not always clear and logical. Engages audience effectively throughout most of the presentation. Presenter(s) spoke clearly to ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was fluent. Information and evidence were adequately presented with a mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. An interesting or original approach taken to the topic that engage the audience’s attention throughout. Presenter(s) spoke clearly and at a good pace to ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was fluent and engaging. Well-presented presented with a clear and logical flow of ideas, arguments and evidence. An interesting, innovative, or original approach taken to the topic that engages the audience’s attention throughout. Presenter(s) spoke clearly and at a good pace to ensure audience comprehension. Delivery was fluent and expressive. Expertly presented with a clear and logical flow of ideas, arguments and evidence. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 8 of 7 Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Use of academic and Poorly presented with Presented according to Presented according to Well-presented and Expertly presented and discipline conventions errors in spelling and academic genre with academic genre with adhered to the adhered to the grammar. accurate spelling, accurate spelling, academic genre with academic genre with Spelling, grammar, grammar, and sentence grammar, and sentence accurate spelling, accurate spelling, sentence construction, appropriate use of There was inconsistent use of good quality, construction. construction. grammar, and sentence construction. grammar, and sentence construction. credible resources. Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing. 5% credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. There were errors in using the APA style. Demonstrated consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these were not always explicit or well developed. Demonstrated consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. Consistently demonstrated expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop Demonstrated expert use of high-quality credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position There were no errors in appropriate arguments statements. Showed There were some errors using the APA style. and statements. Showed extensive evidence of in using APA style. evidence of reading beyond the key reading. reading beyond the key reading. There were no errors in using the APA style. There were no errors in using the APA style. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 9 of 7 Part B: Reflection Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Reflection Reflects on key learnings from the subject using reflective practice. Applies new insights to achieve better outcomes in the future. Reflects on benefits for future study and career. 20% Lack of knowledge of PM concepts in managing IS projects. No attempt at self or group criticism nor ask probing questions about self or group work. Lack of application of new insights to achieve better outcomes in the future. Lack of realisation of future study and career benefits from the learning. Knowledge of PM concepts in managing IS projects resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Some attempt at self or group criticism, but fails to demonstrate awareness of personal biases, stereotypes or preconceptions. Some attempt at asking probing questions about self or group work. Some application of new insights to achieve better outcomes in the future. Limited realisation of future study and career benefits from the learning. Thorough knowledge or understanding of PM concepts in managing IS projects. Some attempt at self- criticism, but fails to demonstrate awareness of personal biases, stereotypes or preconceptions. Asks some probing questions about self or group work but shows limited attempt at answering these. Comprehensive application of new insights to achieve better outcomes in the future. Realises future study and career benefits from the learning. Highly developed understanding of PM concepts in managing IS projects. Demonstrates the ability to question own biases, stereotypes, preconceptions but new modes of thinking is not evident. Asks comprehensive probing questions about self or group work and attempts at answering these. Highly-developed application of new insights to achieve better outcomes in the future. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply tools or techniques for future study and career. A sophisticated understanding of PM concepts in managing IS projects. Demonstrates the ability to question own biases, stereotypes, preconceptions and define new modes of thinking as a result. Articulates highly- developed probing questions and answers about self or group. Sophisticated application of new insights to achieve better outcomes in the future. Expertly articulates, justifies and apply tools or techniques for future study and career. PRO100_Assessment_3_Brief_Reflection & Presentation. Revised 27/11/2020 Page 10 of 7 Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Use of academic and Poorly presented with Presented according to Presented according to Well-presented and Expertly presented and discipline conventions errors in spelling and academic genre with academic genre with adhered to the adhered to the grammar. accurate spelling, accurate spelling, academic genre with academic genre with Spelling, grammar, grammar, and sentence grammar, and sentence accurate spelling, accurate spelling, sentence construction, appropriate use of There was inconsistent use of good quality, construction. construction. grammar, and sentence construction. grammar, and sentence construction. credible resources. Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing. 5% credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. There were errors in using the APA style. Demonstrated consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these were not always explicit or well developed. Demonstrated consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. Consistently demonstrated expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop Demonstrated expert use of high-quality credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position There were no errors in appropriate arguments statements. Showed There were some errors using the APA style. and statements. Showed extensive evidence of in using APA style. evidence of reading beyond the key reading. reading beyond the key reading. There were no errors in using the APA style. There were no errors in using the APA style.
欢迎咨询51作业君
