COMP3900/COMP6390 2021: Project 1 Marking Rubric
Project 1: Background Review (15%)
Criteria High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Numerical
Grade
PROJECT TOPIC (100 words) Marks out of 10 (1.5% of total course mark)
Relevance of topic to
project theme
High degree of relevance Some relevance Sufficient relevance Topic missing or
insufficient
relevance







/10
Scoping of topic
statement to specific
activity, context, and
group of people
Topic addresses all
three areas with
specifics
Topic addresses all
three areas
Topic addresses
two areas
Topic addresses one
area
Insufficient scoping
Marks 10-8 marks 8-7 marks 7-6 marks 6-5 marks <5 marks
LITERATURE REVIEW (600 words) Marks out of 35 (5.25%)
Number of papers
reviewed from the
ACM Digital Library
Four papers reviewed Three papers
reviewed
Two papers reviewed Literature review
missing or one
paper only















/35
Coverage of specified
elements
(project aim and
findings, relevance,
reference).
Reviews cover all
specified elements
Reviews cover most
specified elements
Reviews cover
some specified
elements
Reviews sufficiently
cover at least one of
the specified
elements
Insufficient
coverage of
specified elements
Explanation of aims
and findings
Clear and insightful
explanation of project
aims and findings, that
identifies key issues
Clear explanation of
project aims and
findings
Some explanation
of project aims and
findings
Sufficient indication
of aims and findings
Insufficient
indication of aims
and findings
Relevance of literature
to project topic
Relevance is clearly
explained and justified
Relevance is clearly
explained
Some relevance is
identified
Sufficient
identification of
relevance
Insufficient
relevance
Marks 35-28 35-24.5 24.5-21 21-17.5 <17.5
INTERACTION AND EXPERIENCE ANALYIS (500 WORDS) Marks out of 25 (3.75%)
Description of main
interactions with the
device
Clear and complete
description across
interaction modalities
Clear description
across interaction
modalities
Description of
some interaction
modalities
Sufficient description
of a few interactions
Description of
interactions missing
or insufficient
















/25
Discussion of key user
experience dimensions
Detailed and balanced
discussion that
considers a range of UX
dimensions
Detailed discussion
that considers a
range of UX
dimensions
Some discussion of
UX dimensions, but
lacking in depth or
detail
Sufficient discussion
of UX dimensions
Discussion of UX
dimensions missing
or insufficient
Identification of
usability issues
Original and detailed
discussion with
reference to specific
issues, and suggested
improvements
Detailed discussion
with reference to
specific issues, and
suggested
improvements
Some discussion of
usability issues
Sufficient discussion
of usability issues
Insufficient
discussion of
usability issues
Relevance of design to
project
Relevance clearly
explained and justified
with examples
Relevance clearly
explained and
justified
Relevance
explained but
lacking in detail or
justification
Sufficient explanation
of relevance
Insufficient
explanation of
relevance
Marks 25-20 20-17.5 17.5-15 15-12.5 <12.5
LITERATURE AND PRODUCT REFLECTION (300 WORDS) Marks out of 20 (3%)
Analysis of patterns in
literature and product
review
Original and insightful
analysis. Very good
synthesis that draws
together insights from
across the individual
articles
Insightful analysis.
Good synthesis that
draws together
insights from across
the individual
articles
Good analysis.
Some synthesis of
themes or ideas
across individual
articles
Sufficient analysis
with limited synthesis
across articles
Insufficient analysis
of patterns









/20
Analysis of questions,
gaps, and issues
Original,
comprehensive, and
detailed analysis
Comprehensive and
detailed analysis
Some analysis but
lacking in range or
detail
Sufficient analysis Insufficient analysis
of questions, gaps,
and opportunities
Marks 20-16 16-14 14-12 12-10 <10
REPORT PRESENTATION Marks out of 10 (1.5%)
Structure and
Presentation


Professionally presented, easy to read, follows
structure and length requirements, free from
spelling and grammar errors
Easy to read,
mostly follows
structure and
length
requirements,
mostly free from
Major formatting
issues, does not
follow structure or
length requirements,
major spelling and
grammar errors
Poorly presented,
does not adhere to
structure and length
requirements, poor
spelling and
grammar






spelling and
grammar errors




/10
In-text referencing and
bibliography in Harvard
Referencing Style

Complete and correct
referencing
Mostly complete
and correct
referencing with
minor formatting
issues
Some issues with
completeness and
correctness of
referencing
Sufficient referencing
but with major
omissions in-text or in
the bibliography
Insufficient
referencing
Marks 10-8 8-7 7-6 6-5 <5
TOTAL GRADE
/100


欢迎咨询51作业君