New Zealand Diploma in Information Technology Software Development (Level 6) Course Code & Title: ICT532 Interface Design and User Experience Assignment Title Portfolio Assessment Type Theory/Practical Level 5 Credits 15 Term & Cohort: Due date: Overall Weighting: 80% Total marks available 100 Tutor: Jimmy Connors Course aim The course will introduce you to various principles of user interface design and user experience. Purpose Provides students with the understanding of the principals involved in designing interfaces that are attractive, easy to use and meet the needs of different users. Assessment Information 1. This is an individual open-book assessment which is worth 80% of your total assessment weighting of the entire course. 2. Resources and/or equipment which may be used for this activity: a. NZSE issued material; and b. your own course notes. 3. You have 10 days to complete this assessment 4. Up to 15% of the content may be quoted or paraphrased from other sources provided you acknowledge and cite the original source of the material you use. Use APA 6th edition referencing on all quoted or paraphrased material. 5. Late assessments will incur a penalty of 5% per day (unless an extension is granted before the due date). Any assessment received later than 7 days after the due date will not be marked. 6. Unless otherwise specified, all documents are to be produced following NZSE standards. These are: Normal font is Calibri, size 12 point for the body of all documents with the text fully justified. Headings should not exceed 16 points in size except on a title page where larger fonts are appropriate for the title of a report. Documents should use 1.15 spacing within a paragraph and have a space between paragraphs. Footers should be created on the report that includes a page number. Learning Outcomes This assessment relates to the following learning outcomes: LO 1 Apply design principles for interaction LO 3 Use prototyping to assist in usability and user experience testing LO 4 Apply the principles of responsive design LO 5 Apply the principles of multi-media design GPO’s Analyse requirements, design and document software solutions for a range of problems in an organisational context. Apply a range of software quality assurance techniques to verify correctness of systems. Apply data management and storage technologies to support the software application and the development process Establish application security by integrating security principles throughout software development to ensure system integrity. Plagiarism Any submitted assessment or part of an assessment which has plagiarised content will not be marked. All cases of plagiarism and/or cheating will be investigated and dealt with according to A08: Misconduct in Assessment Policy. Submission Instructions You are required to ensure you have carried out the following before submitting your assessment: Signed assignment coversheet at the end of this document Place your Name, Student ID number, Assessment and Task Number on all loose documents you are submitting with the assessment. All answers must be written in your own words. Proofread and spell check all written assessment work carefully. DO NOT email your document to your tutor Your answers are required to be submitted via the assessment link on the NZSE Learning Management System (Canvas) Assessment Scenario You are an independent Web Designer who has been contracted by MGDB Parts and services, specialises in supplying Rover P6 cars and related accessories, parts and equipment online. Your task is to evaluate and redesign the company’s existing website. Website Link: http://www.roverp6cars.com/?LMCL=myrpsA You will use and evaluate the website below according to the following design principles Interaction Design Principles Responsive Design Principles Multi-media Design Principles You must submit a portfolio that includes the following activities Task 1: Evaluating Website on Application of Principles (34 Marks) (LO 1,4,5) Evaluate the website considering the application of design principles as listed below. Interaction Design Principles Responsive Design Principles Multi-media Design Principles You are required to cover the following for this task: 1. Three principles of interaction design. For each principle, name and explain the principle, then identify two issues (negative aspects) in the website and make suggestions for improvement for each issue you identified. 2. Two principles of responsive design. For each principle, name and explain the principle, then identify one issue (negative aspect) in the website and make suggestions for improvement for the issue you identified. 3. Two principles of multi-media design. For each principle, name and explain the principle, then identify one issue (negative aspect) in the website and make suggestions for improvement the issue you identified. Task 2: Prototype Design and Demonstration (46 Marks) (LO 1,4,5) Apply interactive, responsive and multimedia design principles you have learnt in this course. Propose a new design and create a prototype for the website you have evaluated in activity 1. Your prototype must improve the usability and user experience of MGDB Parts and services website, and your submission must include 3 webpages (home page must be included, covering all critical homepage elements). 2.1 Considering the suggestions from Task 1, create Wireframes for the chosen pages (at least 3 including home page) using a tool of your choice- (images, pdf, screenshot or video recording of wireframes can be provided) Each page should have at least 3 design considerations. 2.2 Now using these wireframes, create prototype for the new website using a tool of your choice. (remember that you have to create at least 3 pages.) 2.3 For each of the 3 webpages that you created, list at least 3 of the improvements/modifications you have made to the initial website design (at least 9 in total). Also justify why you chose to modify these elements? 2.4 Present your prototype in class to the tutor and other students. You will be justifying your selected design elements. Task 3: Prototype Evaluation (20 Marks) (LO 3) List 4 usability evaluation criteria and discuss how and where you have covered each criterion in your prototype, you must demonstrate you have used each criterion twice. You may consider any relevant criteria of Nielsen’s Heuristic Evaluation or Schneiderman’s Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design. ICT532 Interface Design and User Experience Assessment 2: Assignment Marking Criteria Task Assessment Criteria Evidence 1 Website Evaluation of Principles Application /34 1.1 Identifying the interaction design principles issues of the website (18 marks) Learner excellently identified problems related to at least 3 principles and included all of the following: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement for each. (15-18marks) Learner excellently identified problems related to at least 2 principles and included all of the following: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement for each. (10- 14 marks) Learner identified problems related to at least 1 principle and included most of: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement. (6-9 marks) Learner attempted to identify problems related to 3 principle and included some: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement. (3-5 marks) Learner did not provide any answer or provided poor answer. (0-2 mark) _____ /18 1.2 Identifying the responsive design principles issues of the website (8 marks) Learner excellently identified problems related to at least 2 responsive design principles and included all of the following: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement for each. (7-8 marks) Learner excellently identified problems related to at least 1 responsive design principles and included all of the following: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement for each. (5-6 marks) Learner identified problems related to at least 1 principle and included most of: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement. (3-4 marks) Learner attempted to identify problems related to 2 principle and included some of: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement. (2 marks) Learner did not provide any answer or provided poor answer. (0- 1 mark) _____ /8 1.3 Identifying the multi- media desi gn principles issues of the website (8 marks) Learner excellently identified problems related to at least 2 multi-media design principles and included all of the following: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement for each. (7-8 marks) Learner excellently identified problems related to at least 1 multi-media design principles and included all of the following: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement for each. (5-6 marks) Learner identified problems related to at least 1 multi- media design principle and included most of: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement. (3-4 marks) Learner attempted to identify problems related to 2 principle and included some of: Name, Explanation, citation (if needed), and Suggestion for improvement. (1 marks) Learner did not provide any answer or provided poor answer. (0 mark) _____ /8 2 Prototype Design Creating prototype for 3 pages including home page to assist in usability and user experience testing Note: For each page provide modifications with a justification of the changes. The modifications should be consistent with the identified problems in the previous section /46 2.1 Wireframe s (9 marks) Learner provided excellent and consistent wireframe for at least 3 webpages covering the most important requirements of the website and considering at least 3 design considerations (7-9 marks) Learner provided excellent and consistent wireframe for at least 2 webpages (including home page) covering the most important requirements of the website (4-6 marks) Learner provided excellent wireframe for only 1 webpage (home page) covering some requirements of the website (3-5 marks) Learner provided wireframes excluding the home page and meet most of the requirements of the website. (1-2 marks) Learner provided very poor wireframes and did not include the home page. (0 mark) _____ /9 2.2 Prototype (18 marks) Learner provided excellent and consistent prototype for at least 3 webpages covering Learner provided excellent and consistent prototype for at least 2 webpages (including home page) Learner provided excellent and consistent prototype for only 1 webpage (home page) covering Learner provided prototype excluding the home page and meet most of the Learner provided very poor prototype and did not include the home page. the most important requirements of the website (15-18 marks) covering the most important requirements of the website (11-14 marks) some requirements of the website (7-10 marks) requirements of the website. (3-6 marks) (0-2 marks) _____ /18 2.3 Improveme nts (9 marks) Learner provided at least 3 critical element modifications and their justifications for home page (3 marks) Learner provided at least 2 critical element modifications and their justifications for home page (1-2 marks) Learner did not provide any answer or provided poor answer. (0 marks) _____ /3 Learner provided excellent evidence of improvements for at least 3 critical elements for 2nd page (3 marks) Learner provided good evidence of improvements for at least 2 critical elements of 2nd page (1-2 marks) Learner did not provide any answer or provided poor answer. (0 marks) _____ /3 Learner provided excellent evidence of improvements for at least 3 critical elements for 3rd page (3marks) Learner provided good evidence of improvements for at least 2 critical elements of 3rd page (1-2 marks) Learner did not provide any answer or provided poor answer. (0 marks) _____ /3 2.4 Demonstra tion (10 marks) Learner has demonstrated their excellent understanding of prototype in terms of Aesthetics and Functionality and about improvements Learner has demonstrated their good understanding of prototype and about improvements made based on each principle. Learner has demonstrated their fair understanding of prototype and about improvements made based on each principle. Learner has not demonstrated /poorly demonstrated their understanding of prototype and improvements made (0-1 marks) _____ /10 made based on each principle. (8-10 marks) (5-7 marks) (2-4 marks) 3 Prototype Evaluation /20 3.1 List and explanatio n of criterion (4 marks) Learner has listed 4 usability evaluation criterions explaining where and how they are used (4 marks) Learner has listed 2 or 3 usability evaluation criterions explaining where and how they are used (2-3 marks) Learner has listed 0 or 1 usability evaluation criterion explaining where and how they are used (0-1 mark) _____ /4 3.2 Implement ation of criterion (16 marks) Learner has used each of the 4 criterions twice (2 marks each) (13-16 marks) Learner has used each of the 3 criterions twice (2 marks each) (9-12 marks) Learner has used each of the 2 criterions twice (2 marks each) (5-8 marks) Learner has used no or only 1 criterion twice (2 marks each) (0-4 marks) _____ /16 Total Marks /100 New Zealand Diploma in Software Development (Level 6) Cover Sheet and Student Declaration This sheet must be signed by the student and attached to the submitted assessment. Course Title: Interface Design and User Experience Course code: ICT532 Student Name: Student ID: Assessment No & Type: 2-Portfolio Cohort: Due Date: 11/12/2019 Date Submitted: Tutor’s Name: Manya Kaur Assessment Weighting 80% Total Marks 100 Student Declaration: I declare that: I have read the New Zealand School of Education Ltd policies and regulations on assessments and understand what plagiarism is. I am aware of the penalties for cheating and plagiarism as laid down by the New Zealand School of Education Ltd. This is an original assessment and is entirely my own work. Where I have quoted or made use of the ideas of other writers, I have acknowledged the source. This assessment has been prepared exclusively for this course and has not been or will not be submitted as assessed work in any other course. It has been explained to me that this assessment may be used by NZSE Ltd, for internal and/or external moderation. If I am late in handing in this assessment without prior approval (see student regulations in handbook), marks will be deducted, to a maximum of 50%. Student signature: Date: Tutor only to complete Assessment result: Mark /100 Grade
欢迎咨询51作业君
