M3S14 Department of Mathematics Question Q 1 Q 2 Survival Models & Actuarial Applications Examiner's Comments This question was answered very well in all parts. Note that in part (d)(ii) the term "normal" was supposed to imply "typical". This question was answered very well in all parts. Marks were lost in 2(c) due to algebraic errors. Marks were lost in 2(d) because the matix form was not used in (i) and (iii). This question, was in the main part, answered reasonably well. Part (a) required a rigorous proof and it was commont for students to define S(t;0) to be equal to exp(-int mu(s) ds), instead of proving that it's actually the case. (b) and (c) where in the most part answered well. The most common place that significant marks were dropped was in part (d). N(t) and Y(t) needed to be very carefully defined in terms of T and C, and the cumulative intensity (the integral of the intensity) needed to be seen through to it's final expression. (e) caused some problems also, particularly the plot for lambda(t). It was also important to the get the left/right continuity the correct way round and illustrate it on the plot. Q 3 Printed: 27/07/2018 11:48:02 M45S14 Department of Mathematics Question Q 1 Q 2 Survival Models & Actuarial Applications Examiner's Comments This question, was in the main part, answered reasonably well. Part (a) required a rigorous proof and it was commont for students to define S(t;0) to be equal to exp(-int mu(s) ds), instead of proving that it's actually the case. (b) and (c) where in the most part answered well. The most common place that significant marks were dropped was in part (d). N(t) and Y(t) needed to be very carefully defined in terms of T and C, and the cumulative intensity (the integral of the intensity) needed to be seen through to it's final expression. (e) caused some problems also, particularly the plot for lambda(t). It was also important to the get the left/right continuity the correct way round and illustrate it on the plot. This question was answered very well in all parts. Marks were lost in 2(c) due to algebraic errors. Marks were lost in 2(d) because the matix form was not used in (i) and (iii). This question, was in the main part, answered reasonably well. Part (a) required a rigorous proof and it was commont for students to define S(t;0) to be equal to exp(-int mu(s) ds), instead of proving that it's actually the case. (b) and (c) where in the Q 3 Printed: 27/07/2018 11:48:02
欢迎咨询51作业君