A1 Marking Rubric
SM1 2021 COMP20008
Part A Task 1.1
• 2 marks: an accurate data frame.
• -1 mark: summarise outside of 2020
boundary.
• -0.5 mark per incorrect attribute summary.
• 0 mark: 3 or more variables are
incorrectly summarised or not attempted.
1.1
Aggregation
(2 marks)
Part A Task 1.2
•1 mark: correct output as
specified
•-0.5: order of the output are
incorrect.
•0 mark: not attempted, incorrect
values for the new variable
1.2
Add a new
variable
(1 mark)
Part A Task 1 – Overall
• Mark awarded as the break down above.
Output valid csv , and to standard output.
• 0 mark for Task 1: Missing either csv or
standard output. Or the command ‘python
parta1.py owid-covid-data-2020-
monthly.csv’ generates errors or no
output.
Task 1
Overall
Part A Task 2.1
• 1 mark: an accurate plot. with appropriate
title, axis labels, ticks, and tick labels.
• -0.5 mark: correct variables used but not
plotted along the specified axis.
• 0 mark: incorrect variable pairs used or
incorrect plot produced.
Task 2.1
Confirmed
cases in
linear scale
(1 mark)
Part A Task 2.2
• 1 mark: an accurate plot, with appropriate
title, axis labels, ticks, and tick labels.
• -0.5 mark: correct variables used but not
plotted along the specified axis.
• 0 mark: incorrect variable pairs used,
incorrect scales used, or incorrect plot
produced.
Task 2.2
Confirmed
cases in log
scale
(1 mark)
Part A Task 2 – Overall
• Mark awarded as the break down above.
• -0.5 mark: some issues with either of the
plots, e.g. title, labels, etc.
• 0 mark for Task 2: Missing scatter-a.png or
scatter-a.png files from the output. Or Or the
command ‘python parta2.py scatter-a.png
scatter-b.png’ generates errors or no output.
Task 2
Overall
Part A Task 3.1
• 1.5 marks: excellent, clear and succinct
explanations to the pre-processing. Good insights
to limitations of the data.
• 1 mark: good explanations to the pre-processing
steps and reasonable limitations included and or
expressions are at times ambiguous.
• 0.5 mark: some obvious omissions of some pre-
processing steps, data source, and limitations of
the data.
• 0 mark: no explanations or explanations are
incoherent, and difficult to understand.
Task 3.1
preprocessing
reporting
(1.5 marks)
Part A Task 3.2
• 1.5 marks: plots included and excellent, clear, and
succinct explanations of the plots and patterns.
• 1 mark: good explanations of the plots and
reasonable patterns described but may omit some
clear patterns or explanations less clear and at
times ambiguous.
• 0.5 mark: reasonable descriptions of the plots and
the patterns but may contain some incorrect
interpretations or missing key components.
• 0 mark: no explanations or explanations are
incoherent, and difficult to understand
Task 3.2
visual
analysis
(1.5 marks)
Part A Task 3.3
• 1 mark: clear, concise, and meaningful discussions.
• 0.5 mark: the discussion make sense but may be
vague, contain irrelevant information, or miss key
differences between the two scatter plots.
• 0 mark: no discussions or discussions are
incoherent, and difficult to understand
Task 3.3
Contrasting
discussion
(1 mark)
Part A Task 3 – Overall
• Mark awarded as the break down above.
• -1 mark: two plots are not included in the report.
Task 3
Overall
Part B Task 1
• 1 mark: All of the document IDs are
correctly identified and the file formatted
correctly
• 0.5 marks: More than 75% of document IDs
are correctly identified or there are issues
with the file format
• 0 marks: The output is missing or
completely incorrect
Regular
Expressions
(1 mark)
Part B Task 2
• 1 mark: Both case folding and non-alphabetic
character removal are performed correctly
• 0.5 marks: One of case folding or non-alphabetic
character removal is performed correctly
• 0 marks: The output is missing or neither case
folding nor character removal is performed
correctly
Preprocessing
(1 mark)
Part B Task 3
• 2 marks: The output passes all of the
provided test cases
• 1 mark: The output passes at least half
of the provided test cases
• 0 marks: The output is missing or fails
all of the provided test cases
Basic
Search
(2 marks)
Part B Task 4
• 2 marks: The output passes all of the
provided test cases
• 1 mark: The output passes at least half
of the provided test cases
• 0 marks: The output is missing or fails
all of the provided test cases
Advanced
Search
(2 marks)
Part B Task 5
• 3 marks: The output passes all of the provided test
cases
• 2 mark: The output passes two of the provided test
cases
• 1 mark: The output passes one of the provided test
cases
• 0 marks: The output is missing or fails all of the
provided test cases
Search
Rankings
(3 marks)
Part C
• 2 marks: All necessary files have been pushed
to the remote git repository, with a sensible
readme file and commit comments
• 1 mark: All necessary files have been pushed
to the remote git repository
• 0 marks: The git repository does not contain
the correct version of all necessary files
Git
(2 marks)

欢迎咨询51作业君