FIT2090 S2 2020 Exam Feedback General comments: The average score of exam results is 57%. Students did alright in Multiple-Choice Questions, with the average score of 60%. Comments on Section B: Question 1 a. Business Process and the four main components: Majority of the students know what a business process is in general, but do not understand each component and confused with the information system’s components. b. BPR vs. BPI: Overall good, most of the students understand the difference between BPR and BPI. c. Criteria for BPI projects: Only a small group of students got the correct answer with names and brief explanations. Many students answered that inefficient processes should be selected for BPI projects, which is too general. d. CRM, SCM and ERP impacts on business: Most students just answered the definitions of those enterprise systems, but did not analyse the impact of the enterprise systems on costs and revenues. Question 2 For part a, Pareto Chart: Most of the students do not understand what Pareto Chart is and what it is really used for. For part b and c, the seven forms of non-value adding activities and the DMAIC: most students provide partial response without adequate explanation, i.e. identify the forms of TIMWOOD or DMAIC but do not really understand what the individual elements mean. Cannot describe individual elements properly. Most cannot describe DMAIC in relation to Six Sigma properly. Lack of Basic understanding. Question 3 Line balancing. Overall good. Some students did not explain well the purpose of line balancing. For the answers that lose marks, these are the common mistakes: Did not correctly apply the primary and secondary rules, miscalculation on feasible activities/longest time, incorrect assignment of activities due to mistakes on activities’ precedence. Question 4 TOC. a. Some students using 1 week instead of 4 weeks to calculate the available time for each resource. Other common mistake: missing bottleneck identification or did not apply the ranking order correctly. b. Many students only discussed overbooking or missing appropriate examples. Question 5 Cycle time analysis. For part a, some students confused over the concepts of activity time and process time, e.g. in many cases students used activity time + process time to calculate the cycle time. However, there are marks allocated when steps are correct. Other common mistakes: the CT formula has been shown and used incorrectly. Some students used activity times for theoretical cycle time calculations (instead of process times). In some occasions the Cycle time efficiency formula has been incorrect, e.g. CT/CT* instead of CT*/CT. For part b many students did not provide a brief description of the suggested ways to reduce process cycle time. Page 2 of 2 Question 6 a. Students were to answer three questions relating to the modelling tools for process analysis and design. The first was related to describing when you would use each of the following tools: general process charts, system flowcharts, and DFDs (Data Flow Diagrams). Most students had a basic understanding of what was expected for this question. Some students specifically provided a generic answer relating and using words such as data flow, systems process, flow analysis etc. Students who did use specific keywords, e.g. General Process Chart, eliminate non-value-added activities and are used to measure process improvement, in the correct area were allocated most or all of the marks. b. The system development process is a sequential, multistage process to develop information systems from Week 9 slides. Students are required to name in the correct order and provide a description of the six phases in the system development process. As there are several Systems Development processes can be organised, there was some leeway e.g. Investigation, Analysis, Design, Construction, Integration and Testing or Integration, and Testing, Implementation/Deployment. Another way Planning, Analysis, Design, Implementation, Testing, Maintenance. Many students did manage to include each one in the correct order. Some students did not include descriptions, and if they did, they only provided a very basic description. c. There were three main reasons why companies outsource IT, these answers are from Lecture 10, Slide 11, i.e. Financial, Strategic, and Technical. Many students attempted this question, some marks were given if there were some comments e.g. such as a heading like political reason or, cost efficient to utilise the skills from an outsource.
欢迎咨询51作业君