STA490: Evaluation of Statistical Analysis Outstanding (9-10) Good (7-8) Developing (5-6) 0-4 (D) Missing (0) R Code and output (25%) Organization of R code - R code is organized in a way that makes it very easy for the reader to follow - R code is relevant and complete (no non-relevant code included, and no missing elements) - R code is organized in a way that is well organized in general, but in some parts it is a bit unclear - The R code included is relevant, but a few parts are not relevant and/or missing - R code is somewhat organized, but it is difficult for the reader to follow - Large parts of the R code are not relevant and/or missing - R code is not organized - Most of the R code is not relevant Documentation - Variable names are clear and descriptive - Comments are clear and enhance readability of the code - Most variable names are descriptive - Most of the code is commented - Some of the variable names are descriptive, but many are not - Few comments are provided, making some parts of the notebook difficult to follow - Variable names are not descriptive - Limited commenting or documentation Organization of R output - R output is organized in a way that makes it very easy for the reader to follow - Output is relevant and complete (no non-relevant code included, and no missing elements) - R output is organized in a way that is well organized in general, but in some parts it is a bit unclear - Output is relevant, but a few parts are not relevant and/or missing - R output is somewhat organized, but it is difficult for the reader to follow - Many elements of the output are not relevant and/or the output of key analyses are missing - R output is not organized - Most of the output is not relevant Appropriateness of visualizations -Skillful visualizations leading to several important insights into the data as it relates to the research question (univariate and multivariate) - Competent visualizations providing some insights into the data as it relates to the research question (univariate and multivariate) - Some of the visualizations are not clear - Some of the visualizations do not relate to the research question - Visualizations are misleading and lead to incorrect conclusions about the research question Summary of content and rationale (description of statistical tests, CIs, models fit, graphical and numerical summaries) (35%) Appropriateness of methods - Statistical methods are very well suited to answer the research question(s) - Statistical methods are appropriate for the available data (potential points of concern, if any, are addressed clearly) - Statistical methods are mostly suitable to answer the research question(s) - Statistical methods are mostly appropriate for the available data, although there are some points of concern which were not suitably addressed - The statistical methods are not quite suitable to answer key research question(s) - Statistical methods are somewhat appropriate for the available data, although there are major concerns which were not suitably addressed - The statistical methods are not suitable to provide any meaningful insights into the research question(s) - Statistical methods are not appropriate for the data and/or major concerns are not addressed at all. Accurate description of methods - All methods are described clearly and accurately - Level of detail is appropriate - Most methods are described clearly and accurately, although there are a few points of confusion - Level of detail is mostly appropriate - Some methods are described clearly and/or accurately, but there are several areas which are unclear or described inaccurately - Level of detail is somewhat too high or too low - Description of methods are unclear and/or inaccurate in general - Level of detail is much too high or too low Summary of diagnostic procedures / verification of goodness of fit (25%) Accurate description of diagnostics - All diagnostic procedures are described clearly and accurately - Level of detail is appropriate - Most diagnostic procedures are described clearly and accurately, although there are a few points of confusion - Level of detail is mostly appropriate - Some diagnostic procedures are described clearly and/or accurately, but there are several areas which are unclear or described inaccurately - Level of detail is somewhat too high or too low - Description of diagnostic procedures are unclear and/or inaccurate in general - Level of detail is much too high or too low Completeness All relevant diagnostic procedures are conducted to assess the validity of the proposed methods Most relevant diagnostic procedures are conducted to assess the validity of the proposed methods, but a few aspects of diagnostic testing were missed Some relevant diagnostic procedures are conducted to assess the validity of the proposed methods, but several aspects of diagnostic testing were missed Few relevant diagnostic procedures are conducted to assess the validity of the proposed methods Structure (10%) Structure - Document is organized, complete and thorough, including commentary on both why the analysis was done and what was observed - The structure is logical and easy to follow. - Report is mostly organized and complete - Structure is mostly logical. Report is missing some key components or lacks organization Analysis missing many components and lacks organization Reproducibility (5%) Reproducibility Rmd knits with no changes (or just package installation & edit of path to data file) Rmd knits after very minor edits to code Rmd does not knit easily
欢迎咨询51作业君
